I. Markin selling collection

[spigo]

Eugene, not on the forum.

[Евгений]

Сообщение от spigo

Eugene, not on the forum.

I agree with you.

[Veronic]

Сообщение от spigo

Eugene, go to the real muzey.Ya been tam.Ot stylistic mash hurt in glazah.Chuvstvuetsya that people during the collection collection was guided by the advice of a large number artdillerov without their predpochteniy.O it, I know from friends in common.

Most collectors are accused of collecting tasteless or mixed collections. But, if the collector will collect only what fits into the current understanding of the collections, it is possible that it will come to the throat of his own song.
What is wrong with that collection of scattered and styles and artists do not completely overlap with each other? Perhaps just such a collection and will resonate in the hearts of viewers? And over time the collection will be changed, supplemented ....

[Yaya]

Сообщение от spigo

A Markin, frankly weak Collector: no exposition of the concept in its museum (solid mishmash, saying look what I bought), or personal preferences in painting (the animal is omnivorous). Nemukhin, in his opinion, too weak an artist. too soon began to try on "coat Tretjakova".

spigo, but he blows at every corner, as the likes Krasnopevtsev!

[spigo]

Сообщение от Yaya

spigo, but he blows at every corner, as the likes Krasnopevtsev!

Krasnopevtsev had a really good and in large numbers, including muzee.Takzhe good Zverev, Yakovlev, Veysberg.Daleko not all museum level, the installation leaves much to be luchshego.Esli man skisnet after the crisis, perhaps the museum will become a museum, and There is just a collection of paintings.

[ФАИв]

Well of course you can popinat man who took the liberty and the costs to be not small, and exhibited his collection. Can Markin treat as you like, but we must admit that the way the postwar and contemporary art, he did not do enough. Including paying no small money for the work of non-conformists and kontemporari. In my opinion he Semenihin, Bondarenko (as I heard) and even MB 3-4 people - raised, (including your money) interest in the sixties and made to make many art dealers.
It's easy to gloat over them now, forgetting the french champagne drunk on its opening day.
  Do not forget that the exhibition area and Markina Fund Eateriny show a very interesting exhibition, not freed (in the case of Catherine) from the taint of a glamorous, but as a rule is always an event.
And compare the collectors of 2000's, with those who began to collect 30 40 years ago is not entirely correct.
Museum Markina only 2 years, God willing (agree with Veronik) survive the crisis, peretryaset their collection. And places in Moscow where you can see a good selection of the Sixties on permanent display in just a few, if not at all. It shows that Tretyakovka not want to even discuss.

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от spigo

hanging poor.

In my view, the importance factor weighing heavily exaggerated (is that "and you, my friends, no matter how sit ..."). Museum Markina live classroom, with his idea and his mood. With regard to the uneven quality - sorry miles, each has its own head on his shoulders. Not everything is for us to Pavel Tretyakov think The only thing lacking in the museum Markina - a smart plates. I hope he would be good.

[spigo]

No merit Markina not detract from, but when he starts instead of tablets in his museum to hang labels on the universally recognized masters, and he ceases to be a "sacred cow"

[ФАИв]

Well, it's a matter of taste, I like Nemukhin the same as a painter is not very impressive. This masterpiece of work had I did not see much, but more and more auto-repeat, rather boring. While the personality, the source and historian of his time and environment, Vladimir magnificent and monumental. Well now, you can not have and express their opinions about his work? And there shortcuts?

[spigo]

FAIv, you just do not like it, that's OK, but you do not say that Nemukhin and unknown weaknesses hudozhniki.Ili something I do not understand.