Think - like in the seventeenth century?

[Marassa]

Oil on canvas.
135 x 102 cm

[Solovlad]

Good time.
Anyway, something very interesting and not reproducing, I think.
With HC.

[художник Федотов]

Option, a copy of Ribera..."Saint Jerome"...

[Кирилл Сызранский]

[QUOTE=художник Федотов;3469141]Option, a copy of Ribera..."Holy Ieronim@

So this is St. Jerome, and in the description write - José de Ribera''s circle.

The question should be rephrased, as I understand it: Marassa ask, and like the painting itself is a work of the seventeenth century?
Here's the flip side of this picture, by the way.

[uriart]

Marassa, you Need to be very confident to tell about the time the painting was only looking at the monitor.

[redbor]

Glasses which are fashionable at St. Jerome! St. Jerome lived in the 4th century.
I wonder where then, in the 4th century it was possible to buy points?

[художник Федотов]

Сообщение от uriart

Marassa, you Need to be very confident to tell about the time the painting was only looking at the monitor.
__________________

The picture just could not be written in the 17th century, argue...

Based on the pictures, it is obvious that the artist used a photo image on the canvas (see "the mystery of the old masters" Hockney)...In the 17th century the greatest success with the use of optics(not to be confused with the "camera obscura") succeeded "caravaggisti" and Vermeer...But they have a photographic paintings more archaic(more bugs), due to the extreme cost, the rarity of lenses and curved mirrors...Also at that time there was no tradition of St. Jerome to write in glasses, is a more recent discovery...Caravaggisti wrote it with a magnifying glass(see photo)...

It is evident that the artist uses very good optics for the picture...It has become more or less available in the 18th century as "fashion glasses"...where he writes from "yourself", that would match multiple images on canvas, the "floats"...Enough to pay attention to the disproportionately long legs, not written photographic clothing, unconvincing shadow, etc....Although on his hands, he just saw all the veins...

Generally speaking, it is a clever "coloring" of his time...Today similar things makes N. Cass and other craftsmen to the delight of all...

[redbor]

What they all draw Jerome glasses? Do you not know that in his time the lens was not? Probably some kind of preraphaelite the 21st century, writes St. Jerome with an iPad?

[художник Федотов]

Сообщение от redbor

Why are they all draw Jerome glasses? Do you not know that in his time the lens was not?

There is not the Orthodox view that St. Jerome lived somewhere in the 16th century... http://chronology.org.ru/%D0%9D%D0%B...BE%D0%B3%D0%BE Then with the glasses was relatively not bad...

The vast majority of images(archaic-old all show St. Jerome without lenses and glasses...later draw his glasses, as a symbol of "learning"...Attribute of the scientist 18, 19 centuries were a magnifying glass or glasses...because Jerome made a number of landmark translations(e.g., the Bible), with vision he had problems by the artist...And some artist in the 19th century took the image of the scientist of his time, not knowing well the history, and sculpted his glasses ...

After some time, not very historically-educated artists, who were the majority, with an iPad, for Bible translation and will write Jerome...

[Marassa]

[QUOTE=Кирилл Сызранский;3469151]Here's the flip side of this picture, kstate@
I am in awe
Auction house in the spree until Thursday, and you managed to get the back side