Watercolour help to understand whose signature - Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство

Marik · 28.03.2015, 16:32

Good day got such aquarelles, please help to understand whose can be signed.

Kaestlin · 29.03.2015, 22:08

Marik, the author would not agree to this, but if there not there connoisseur. here's what I'd do in your position: watched satiric magazines 1905-6. At least one number each. The author is more likely there is to be published, even in PM with this picture She is on some topic of the day. Grandpa on the right reads "Speech" (apparently because of the format of the newspaper). Steady hand. Characteristic handwriting in the figure of the head of the family - he MB recognizable. But we know one or two tenths of these illustrators. The others sank.

Marik · 30.03.2015, 17:01

Thanks for the interest, by the way have you noticed that they all sit with my pants down on the pot so to speak

I wonder what could it be drawn ?

Борис Кон · 30.03.2015, 17:42

This is unlikely for the magazine, too weak level of execution.
I think it's some kind of friendly cartoon - escasany.
Then intelligent people in the computer didn't stare, pork is not discussed.
Amused as she could.

annagavr · 30.03.2015, 18:11

[QUOTE=Борис Кон;3417971]
I think it's some kind of friendly cartoon - escasany@
With the signature? It is unlikely.
Just have doubts that it was published.

28.03.2015, 16:32	Язык оригинала: Русский #1
Marik Пользователь Регистрация: 11.11.2013 Сообщений: 35 Спасибо: 13 Поблагодарили 1 раз в 1 сообщении Репутация: 2	Watercolour help to understand whose signature Good day got such aquarelles, please help to understand whose can be signed.

30.03.2015, 17:42	Язык оригинала: Русский #4
Борис Кон Гуру Регистрация: 03.09.2012 Адрес: Киев Сообщений: 2,538 Спасибо: 1,799 Поблагодарили 1,810 раз(а) в 977 сообщениях Репутация: 3291	This is unlikely for the magazine, too weak level of execution. I think it's some kind of friendly cartoon - escasany. Then intelligent people in the computer didn't stare, pork is not discussed. Amused as she could. __________________ Убивать эстетов, понятно, лучше всего дорогими предметами искусства, чтобы, испуская дух, они возмущались таким святотатством. Генрих Теодор Бёлль Борис: konboris3@gmail.com

Похожие темы
Тема	Автор	Разделы	Ответов	Последние сообщения
Watercolour. To identify the author.	Ладик	Costs, valuation, attribution	1	15.02.2015 10:59
Watercolour. A signature?	mileva	Costs, valuation, attribution	2	05.12.2014 19:46
MK Signature?. Please help to identify the signature on the painting!	Artem-Kireev	Costs, valuation, attribution	17	17.07.2013 13:19
Help understand	Vilonik	Art Kaleidoscope	12	05.02.2010 01:33

29.03.2015, 22:08	Язык оригинала: Русский #2
Kaestlin Бывалый Регистрация: 04.03.2015 Сообщений: 433 Спасибо: 267 Поблагодарили 561 раз(а) в 263 сообщениях Репутация: 1141	Marik, the author would not agree to this, but if there not there connoisseur. here's what I'd do in your position: watched satiric magazines 1905-6. At least one number each. The author is more likely there is to be published, even in PM with this picture She is on some topic of the day. Grandpa on the right reads "Speech" (apparently because of the format of the newspaper). Steady hand. Characteristic handwriting in the figure of the head of the family - he MB recognizable. But we know one or two tenths of these illustrators. The others sank.

30.03.2015, 17:01	Язык оригинала: Русский #3
Marik Пользователь Регистрация: 11.11.2013 Сообщений: 35 Спасибо: 13 Поблагодарили 1 раз в 1 сообщении Репутация: 2	Thanks for the interest, by the way have you noticed that they all sit with my pants down on the pot so to speak I wonder what could it be drawn ?

30.03.2015, 18:11	Язык оригинала: Русский #5
annagavr Banned Регистрация: 17.09.2013 Сообщений: 432 Спасибо: 296 Поблагодарили 285 раз(а) в 178 сообщениях Репутация: 572	[QUOTE=Борис Кон;3417971] I think it's some kind of friendly cartoon - escasany@ With the signature? It is unlikely. Just have doubts that it was published.