N. The Timka, "Flowers"

[artcol]

[QUOTE=ANATOLY;3330071]I think is a compilation of his work "okna@
Of course, compiling. Whole farm work tirelessly - fake and compile timkova.

denisio77, here no one will tell. Consult competent professionals, I think in St. Petersburg You will easily find who was holding more than one job timkova.

[U_Z]

Сообщение от denisio77

ask experts to help with attribution and evaluation of the painting "Flowers" , the artist N. Timkova, oil on canvas, 65 cm 65 cm, without loss

"When done" in the lower right corner and the signature induced, IMHO.

[Smirnoff]

Not Timka.
He never signed.
Painting and not near him.

[kozhinart]

Please try to contact the website http://www.leningradschool.com/index_r.html

[K-Maler]

Сообщение от mihailovoh

Signature was not timkova.but still life is not bad in itself.

It is necessary to look at how the signed work with turnover.
Signature similar to the signature faces, but the Timka if you need to sign turnover would have done it differently. Was the habit of certain requirements how to do it. (I am not going to teach deceivers).
Secondly, the suspicion that the background is inscribed for credibility may take place: this house is too elaborate and spoil the bunch, in this case, the background should be lighter.
Made by a skillful hand.

[K-Maler]

Сообщение от artcol

Texas? At the auction? Russian artist? For 100 so$?!!!

More recently, he sold the land for 3000.D. After his death there came and all bought from relatives, a lot of work.
When life bought a little, he had need.
Now caught on and forge...
Another example and a lesson for investors, the opportunity to think about how to look for, when and from whom to purchase works for collections or investments.
All artists start out as unknown.
Americans bought timkova were really smart. They knew two things: first, that there are many good artists, because the school has survived, and the second is that the unclaimed works a lot, because there is no market. What relatives will sell - it goes without saying, because the workshop should be released, and no place to keep the picture, but still in good form. On the question of promotion.
This situation persists today. "Smart" continue to come and buy.
Pay convenient for the artist and favorable price. This is the initial stage, which was always. Auctions then.
Alas, the example of van Gogh didn't teach anything Here... and Timka....

[artcol]

[QUOTE=K-Maler;3336101]More recently, he sold the land for 3000 t.D. After his death there came and all bought from relatives, a lot of work.
When life bought a little, he had need.
Now caught on and forge...
Another example and a lesson for investors, the opportunity to think about how to look for, when and from whom to purchase works for collections or investments.
All artists start out as unknown.
Americans bought timkova were really smart. They knew two things: first, that there are many good artists, because the school has survived, and the second is that the unclaimed works a lot, because there is no market. What relatives will sell - it goes without saying, because the workshop should be released, and no place to keep the picture, but still in good form. On the question of promotion.
This situation persists today. "Smart" continue to come and buy.
Pay convenient for the artist and favorable price. This is the initial stage, which was always. Auctions then.
Alas, the example of van Gogh didn't teach anything Here... Timkov@
I am aware of. I have a big collection and I continue to buy as many others on this site. The material goes. Just yesterday thought over the question - how much it was, how much was taken out, how much is left... In principle, there is little...

[mcshan]

[QUOTE=K-Maler;3336101]More recently, he sold the land for 3000 t.D. After his death there came and all bought from relatives, a lot of work.
When life bought a little, he had need.
Now caught on and forge...
Another example and a lesson for investors, the opportunity to think about how to look for, when and from whom to purchase works for collections or investments.
All artists start out as unknown.
Americans bought timkova were really smart. They knew two things: first, that there are many good artists, because the school has survived, and the second is that the unclaimed works a lot, because there is no market. What relatives will sell - it goes without saying, because the workshop should be released, and no place to keep the picture, but still in good form. On the question of promotion.
This situation persists today. "Smart" continue to come and buy.
Pay convenient for the artist and favorable price. This is the initial stage, which was always. Auctions then.
Alas, the example of van Gogh didn't teach anything Here... Timkov@

Sorry for the boring - still, probably, over 3 thousand dollars.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

[QUOTE="K-Maler;3336101"]More recently, he sold the land for TD@
"Recently" is when. The artist died in 1993, 20 years ago, and since 1998 it began to exhibit in different U.S. cities. Then, in 1998 in the United States was published his first monograph.

[denisio77]

ALL PARTICIPANTS THANK YOU VERY MUCH!!! IF ANYONE IS INTERESTED IN A PAINTING PLEASE CONTACT IN PM