Contemporary art in museums

[Ninni]

Сообщение от Eugene

You are mistaken, a beast was a very talented artist.

On the talent is difficult to argue, Eugene, and why? Everyone still keeps his conviction.

[Meister]

Ninni, I assure you, Zverev exactly go down in history of art as a significant non-conformist artists ... And unlike most contemporary artists, he is clearly not "one month" on the market. He was insanely talented, just not all the ideas he managed to express on canvas ... But new ideev he had more than most of his sogruppnikov most of the participants ... And the art market knows about it ...

[qwerty]

Сообщение от Meister

He was insanely talented, just not all the ideas he managed to express on canvas ...

Talent once was, so what! Only his last twenty years have passed, so to speak softer, senselessly. No studio, no serious work, in fact, some "sponge bow." Did what they bought, and it is - a sure road to degradation. He himself understood this, saying to himself that as an artist, he is after the mid-sixties was over. But the best works - he, of course, artist.

[Евгений]

Сообщение от Ninni

On the talent is difficult to argue, Eugene,

You write: "Many people are well aware that an artist like Zvereva actually bubble
100%of professional art dealers, collectors, art critics, all who are engaged in serious contemporary art feel differently.

[LCR]

Сообщение от Eugene

You write: "Many people are well aware that an artist like Zvereva actually bubble
100%of professional art dealers, collectors, art critics, all who are engaged in serious contemporary art feel differently.

No, not 100%. At best, the 99.99999 ...%
Here I am - an art, but Zvereva good artist does not think so. I think that his work terribly vulgar and banal - Women's bow lips (not to say, chicken poopka) yes rollicking signature, this is not enough for painting.

[Евгений]

LCR, goes without saying that you are not expected .. well agree 99,9%

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от LCR

I think that his work terribly vulgar and banal - Women's bow lips (not to say, chicken poopka)

This late Zverev, Aseeva portraits, custom portraits needful - that reservoir of creativity that savvy collectors are also not considered valuable. So there is no contradiction, a little Zvereva who loves and praises. Obviously he is remembered for the 50 th - 60 th, for the masterpieces. Which unfortunately is practically no place to look in the museum space - a large part of the great works are in private collections. It sounds snobbish, but beasts - it is such a "disheveled artist", for which there is broad market works. And for the market success of the high volume of work needed and the average quality in circulation. Then the sum objective understanding of the auction, how much should cost Zverev. In the meantime, each on a whim, decides how much it should cost.

[Ninni]

Сообщение от Eugene

You write: "Many people are well aware that an artist like Zvereva actually bubble
100%of professional art dealers, collectors, art critics, all who are engaged in serious contemporary art feel differently.

  Just "many" - of course not all the same.
and once again confirm that as long as advantageous to expose a genius - will extol. Nothing he said his "art" so to speak, and not tried. On his "work" even difficult to talk seriously - not art. There is artifice and vulgarity (agree wholeheartedly with the LCR). Shard of glass as not to rub to a shine - diamonds will not. It is my opinion and do not want to offend anyone.

[Meister]

Ninni, I think before you speak like that, you should look at the work before the mid-sixties, and then make your opinion ..

[LCR]

Сообщение от Meister

[B]I think before you speak like that, you should look at the work before the mid-sixties, and then make their opinion ..

That's really someone who, as you, Master, be ashamed to say that! Have you forgotten the first vstechu your main character with a sort of young, but full of promise, a poet?

"- And you, what, my poems do not like? - Curiously asked
Ivan.
      - Really hate.
      - And what you read?
      - No, I did not read your poetry! - Nervously exclaimed the visitor.
      - And how do you say?
      - Well, what of it - the guest replied, - as if I had not read the other? "

But it's not very fair on my part, I'm so, so that annoy you

But seriously, Do you think, I did not see Zvereva "until the mid 60-ies"?
I do not like his work, either before or after the 60's, empty your Zverev.
I can not say that he had no talent, but talent without taste, without culture, without some kind of spiritual nobility, too, not that. That's it, sir - and I did not swear, do not forget that you are on probation ))))))