Updated rating of the most expensive living artist

[qwerty]

I can not agree with the esteemed LCR a lack of interest of the West to contemporary Russian art in general and in particular to Nemukhin, rubles, Rabin - enough to see a list of foreign exhibitions of these artists, which surpasses one hundred. I am sure that their work, and Sitnikova, Schwartzman, Sveshnikov, Rukhin, Veisberg, Steinberg (surely someone forgot) is waiting for a bright future. Leaders, however, in my opinion, will Krasnopevtsev and Plavinsky (I would venture to suggest that it is their "concealed" from the public LCR).

[LCR]

Сообщение от qwerty

I can not agree with the esteemed LCR a lack of interest of the West to contemporary Russian art in general and in particular to Nemukhin, rubles, Rabin - enough to see a list of foreign exhibitions of these artists, which surpasses one hundred. I am sure that their work, and Sitnikova, Schwartzman, Sveshnikov, Rukhin, Veisberg, Steinberg (surely someone forgot) is waiting for a bright future. Leaders, however, in my opinion, will Krasnopevtsev and Plavinsky (I would venture to suggest that it is their "concealed" from the public LCR ).

You should know better, so I will not argue, however, categorically refuse to Krasnopevtsev and Plavinsky - or de Chirico's "second freshness, nor ohristianivshiysya Dubuffet for the poor did not attract me.

P.S. Rukhin and Weisberg - this is certainly artists.

[Vladimir]

LCR,
so too harshly. His De Chirico, Fontana, Morandi, Cezanne was among many artists, under this reasoning can be "slaughtered" half of the 20 th century Russian art, including the vanguard of the 1910-ies, sezannistov, and even more so our post-war art, including securities of the metaphysicians. If the intention to build a comparative series, then everybody has to do: and Nemukhin, and anyone, including Veisberg.

In my opinion, de Chirico at Krasnopevtsev ended in the early 1960's (approximately 1962) and if the ideas can be found consonance with someone (I can not name from memory), then at least the technology, according to the methods by kropotilivosti much does one can hardly find the analogue.
Or those same big things Plavinsky ... everything. And the astounding scale with delalizatsii so high, and cold, and decoration. Watch live - quite impressive.

Of the several proposed qwerty, the success of the west I would put more on the ruble and Nemukhin (not being a fan of their beliefs). Argument: their works are at the junction of decorative arts and design, the series of images are recognizable, there is irony and aggression that makes them still today. I kazhdetsya for the Western audience, they understand. As understood by the same E. Steinberg. But Krasnopevtsev may not understand - he was too handsome in a literal sense, though not of our century. Deeply loved by me Yakovlev - an innovator, but, again, very Russian painter.

[qwerty]

Vladimir, absolutely agree with you on the whole argument. As Krasnopevtsev, it is so harmonious, that does not understand it is impossible.

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от qwerty

Vladimir, absolutely agree with you on the whole argument. As Krasnopevtsev, it is so harmonious that it is impossible not to understand him.

Understand something understood. But the problem of perception, I think, that's what. We Krasnopevtsev harmony renaissance, even in extreme extent, the 16 th century. It pleases the eye as Bruegel as "Hunters in the Snow." That is beautiful as a good Dutchman. And at all times will find its connoisseur. But now the time fast, the new rate, the headset in the ear, the lack of free time, kicks from work, from an overabundance of information, from the rich life. And the beauty is not appreciated. Valued drive, super strong emotions, things are able to "awaken" rich man era of consumption, which, apparently, already tried everything. Sorry for the metaphor, but in successfully addressed the West must be the product of something emotional, drug, stimulant or ottalkvayuschee not important. At the same Tsalkova this is even without beauty. That is, the point is not how harmonious Krasnopevtsev, but the fact that rapid Pelevin at this stage will be more successful contemplative Pushkin.

[Vladimir]

qwerty,
about recognized in the West countrymen (well, more accurately, the USSR) forgot to add to Kabakov, Boris Mikhailov and Oleg Kulik. The same phenomenon, when in the west, people are more understandable than the public in the former USSR.