Not R. Falk... - Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство

sergejnowo · 14.11.2014, 13:20

[QUOTE=sergey7;3278421]"mileva, full porn!"
__________________
George, not porn, huge@

I wonder on what basis such a diagnosis?
Every sensible fan art it is clear that the work to Robert Rafailovich Falk has nothing.
On artprice registered not less than 30 artists with the name Falk. And a little-known and not considered of Falicov in a couple of times more.
What is it with porn?

redbor · 14.11.2014, 15:22

Цитата:

Сообщение от sergejnowo

On artprice registered not less than 30 artists with the name Falk

But the signature is then copies it Robert Rafaelita.
Therefore, it is not one of the "little-known falkow", and, to put it mildly, fake famous R. Falk. And very inferior

sergejnowo · 14.11.2014, 16:23

redbor, below the reference signature Falk with artprica.
What is not very likely.
As signed, this is the most that is not a typical signature, calligraphy, for Europe, +/- 1900.

U_Z · 14.11.2014, 17:04

Цитата:

Сообщение от sergejnowo

since signed, this is the most that is not a typical signature, calligraphy, for Europe, +/- 1900.

The signature at work - typically-recognizable for Falk R. R. in this case, looks like it is deliberately provocative.

PS: Maybe red brought someone to bad thoughts/actions

, but rather, just some "other" Falk (painting weak, and the signature "solid").

redbor · 14.11.2014, 18:11

Цитата:

Сообщение от sergejnowo

redborbelow the reference signature Falk with artprica.
What is not very likely.
As signed, this is the most that is not a typical signature, calligraphy, for Europe, +/- 1900.

sergejnowo, with all due respect, I am very surprised your such a message.

Falk far more signatures than you find in artpricе..
Now, just in case. signature Falk, quite frequently.

sergejnowo · 14.11.2014, 18:31

Цитата:

Сообщение от redbor

sergejnowo, with all due respect, I am very surprised your such a message. At Falk far more signatures than you find in artpricе..
Now, just in case. signature Falk, quite frequently.

I even didn't realize it was Falk Robert Rafailovich.
Painting not even close his signature "solid", optical clearly inconsistent manner on your example.
Yes, and the subject is "Not R. Falk... "

Цитата:

Сообщение от U_Z

PS: Maybe red brought someone to bad thoughts/actions, but rather, just some "other" Falk (painting weak, and the signature "solid").

redbor · 14.11.2014, 18:40

[QUOTE="sergejnowo;3278771"]I even didn't realize it was Falk Robert Rafailovich@
And no one came, even the owner of the picture.

But a "master" wanted to give you precisely for R. Falk, and therefore the signature depicted him...

U_Z · 14.11.2014, 18:56

[QUOTE="redbor;3278781"]But a "master" wanted to give you precisely for R. Falk, and therefore the signature depicted ago@

It is unlikely. Painting (given the extremely poor photo) work written in the late 19th-early 20th century, IMHO

mileva · 14.11.2014, 19:17

Цитата:

Сообщение от U_Z

Unlikely. Painting (given the extremely poor photo) work written in the late 19th-early 20th century, IMHO

Today, will post better...

redbor · 14.11.2014, 19:51

Message from redbor
But a "master" wanted to give you precisely for R. Falk, and therefore the signature depicted him...

Цитата:

Сообщение от U_Z

Unlikely. Painting (given the extremely poor photo) work written in the late 19th-early 20th century, IMHO

. So you think this is the work of R. R. Falk, who himself and podisus?

Похожие темы
Тема	Автор	Разделы	Ответов	Последние сообщения
Falk?	Андрей Жданов	Costs, valuation, attribution	7	10.02.2014 23:05
Falk?	bykinist	Costs, valuation, attribution	1	09.11.2012 20:47
Falk	Картина07	Costs, valuation, attribution	1	18.06.2010 12:39
Falk	redbor	Costs, valuation, attribution	6	29.09.2009 22:22
Do Falk?	Allena	Art Kaleidoscope	0	13.07.2009 16:37

14.11.2014, 13:20	Язык оригинала: Русский #1
sergejnowo Гуру Регистрация: 24.02.2009 Адрес: Гамбург Сообщений: 3,845 Спасибо: 3,565 Поблагодарили 4,959 раз(а) в 1,455 сообщениях Репутация: 9306	[QUOTE=sergey7;3278421]"mileva, full porn!" __________________ George, not porn, huge@ I wonder on what basis such a diagnosis? Every sensible fan art it is clear that the work to Robert Rafailovich Falk has nothing. On artprice registered not less than 30 artists with the name Falk. And a little-known and not considered of Falicov in a couple of times more. What is it with porn?

14.11.2014, 16:23	Язык оригинала: Русский #3
sergejnowo Гуру Регистрация: 24.02.2009 Адрес: Гамбург Сообщений: 3,845 Спасибо: 3,565 Поблагодарили 4,959 раз(а) в 1,455 сообщениях Репутация: 9306	redbor, below the reference signature Falk with artprica. What is not very likely. As signed, this is the most that is not a typical signature, calligraphy, for Europe, +/- 1900.

14.11.2014, 18:40	Язык оригинала: Русский #7
redbor Гуру Регистрация: 26.01.2009 Сообщений: 4,909 Спасибо: 799 Поблагодарили 1,712 раз(а) в 1,079 сообщениях Репутация: 3349	[QUOTE="sergejnowo;3278771"]I even didn't realize it was Falk Robert Rafailovich@ And no one came, even the owner of the picture. But a "master" wanted to give you precisely for R. Falk, and therefore the signature depicted him...

14.11.2014, 18:56	Язык оригинала: Русский #8
U_Z Гуру Регистрация: 20.07.2009 Адрес: Москва Сообщений: 1,921 Спасибо: 1,616 Поблагодарили 1,642 раз(а) в 872 сообщениях Репутация: 2866	[QUOTE="redbor;3278781"]But a "master" wanted to give you precisely for R. Falk, and therefore the signature depicted ago@ It is unlikely. Painting (given the extremely poor photo) work written in the late 19th-early 20th century, IMHO