Wassily Kandinsky exhibition at the Pompidou Center

[Tana]

qwerty and what the audience's reaction (if you can describe it?)

I was reminded of Marc Chagall exhibition in Paris in 2003., also defended the huge queue, all the halls were crowded and there in front of a picture was a lot of people, something they're trying to make out with reverence:
the picture was painted in a provincial town, a fence and peasant spravlyayuschy need a fence, and wore a sign on the fence, which both tried to disassemble the French: "fool".

[qwerty]

The people, as I wrote, it was a great deal, and very different: from London to the dandy rockers in leather with rivets, and some very bomzhevatogo types of personalities. The main difference from many other exhibitions that people were standing in front of pictures of a very long time, retreated, returned and again looked. So before I have one picture for an hour three times, met with a very touching pair - old man with, apparently, his wife in a wheelchair. And most of all liked the scene: in front of one "Improvisation" lay on the floor about seven-year Negro and something deliriously imagined a little album, constantly looking at Kandinsky. I walked over and looked into his little album, there was painted ... bunny!

[Кирилл Сызранский]

For myself, has brought: if a painting "hold", not "let go", it means really.
Sometimes, even angry at myself. We must go further, there came something to work for a specific viewing specific, but still, as you go past Larionov, for example, or Goncharova, ostonavlivaeshsya, worth a look. A hundred times already this soldier saw or a landscape. : D

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

For myself, has already brought: if a painting "hold", not "let go", it means really.
Sometimes, even angry at myself. We must go further, there came something to work for a specific viewing specific, but still, as you go past Larionov, for example, or Goncharova, ostonavlivaeshsya, worth a look. A hundred times already this soldier saw or a landscape. : D

        Well written, as many a tear knocks! Not clear, Kirill, what have you for this work: walk past the "present" for "specific view an individual? What is it you are "browsing" "concrete"? That "real", which you are viewing, whether it is present in contrast to the "real", by which you go to him? And let me give you some advice, instead of being angry, is not it better to choose another route and not go past the "Larionov, for example, or Goncharova," and go straight to the "specific"? Because it is clear that if "a hundred times" "stop, stand and watch" for "soldier" or "this landscape in an effort to" specific "inevitably comes frustration, grow in an uncontrolled aggression.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Tjutchev

does not go past the "Larionov, for example, or Goncharova," and go straight to the "specific"?

I can not pass.
You, I realized in those places is not a frequent visitor ... And I would have immediately understood everything about my trip. : D

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

I can not pass.
You, I realized in those places is not a frequent visitor ... And I would have immediately understood everything about my trip. : D

        You all understood correctly ...: D