Expertise

[Сима]

Antikvar, not a fig. Just bull by the horns. And anonymous, I hope - the experts? Well, just a range of feelings. : mad:: shy:: D

[Antikvar]

Anonymity is due to a client, I believe that you should not talk about the reluctance of many owners to stay in the shadows. There are still many aspects which go "street" is currently more expensive.

[dedulya37]

Antikvar, is, of course, not an exam, but may be in the form of exemptions you ask their experts to attribute the unknown to me now? Subject was discussed, I think forumcanam also be interesting.
If you have any questions - write a personal message. Thank you.

http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=17855

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от Antikvar

There are many aspects which go "street" is currently more expensive.

Here's more about this, please.

[Antikvar]

Сообщение от Tjutchev

Here's more about this, please.

Do not want to discredit someone in person, or any organization as a whole. Especially in public. There is a certain set of "complications" that probably many experienced. Once again, I make a reservation - this topic is rather for private conversation.

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от Antikvar

do not want to discredit someone in person, or any organization as a whole. Especially in public. There is a certain set of "complications" that probably many experienced. Once again, I make a reservation - this topic is rather for private conversation.

       I think you just all and discredit. That is all, and it publicly.

[Евгений]

Сообщение от Tjutchev

I think you just all and discredit. That is all, and it publicly.

I agree with you completely that it's wrong ..
The site is a normal advisory council, is distinguished public people (experts).
To send information about a work of art (often very high cost), and possibly other information, unknown mediator?
But if the administration allows the site to conduct such an advertising company probably Admin knows about Antikvar, more than we are with you.

[Konstantin]

Eugene No, we (the administration of the site) do not know who's behind the nickname Antikvar. But whether you want to edit out? In my opinion, and so everything is clear. Validating preferred and it is more important than direct censorship.

[Евгений]

Сообщение от Konstantin

does not know who's behind the nickname Antikvar.

What's the point then allow to engage in such activities on the site?
Perhaps more detailed account of the expert council of the site, give the floor to the distinguished experts? Let commenting "mediation" services Antikvar, if this is all within the law?

Сообщение от Konstantin

In my opinion, and so everything is clear.

I agree, but the comments of experts (real) on this subject are needed.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Eugene

I agree with you completely that it's wrong ..

And what is the problem, then?
What is "what is wrong?

Сообщение от Eugene

What's the point then allowed to engage in such activities on the site?

And what is "such activities"?
There was a proposal to become a link between the consumer and expert institution.
What's criminal?
Explain who can. Intelligibly, without meaningful hints. Straight.
I personally do not see anything wrong in this mediation.
I like nemoskvichu, such a proposal interesting.
Yes, I'm curious to agree in advance on the phone to come and touch on the same day to the appropriate specialist, to show him the object, to hear his opinion of first impression, it is reasonable to do, whether or not the general examination, discuss the questions that interested me in the examination, discuss the timing etc.
I confess, I can do myself, but often I have in Moscow because of this stay, do a lot of calls, spend time at meetings, etc.
When functioning properly mediator can, in my opinion, this whole routine, unnecessary, nerve-racking, to avoid.
No, I do not understand you, Eugene, Tjutchev ...

Сообщение от Tjutchev

I think you just all and discredit.

Who? What?