Maurice Denis (1870-1943)

[Sandro]

voloviks, you have to be thinner!
Exactly what Liana unloved left lastly, lastly but not yet come.
You read the posts LCR ppovnimatelnee and understand who and what is understood in the art!

[voloviks]

Сообщение от Sandro

have to be thinner!
Exactly what Liana unloved left lastly, lastly but not yet come.
You read the posts LCR ppovnimatelnee and understand who and what is understood in the art!

Reading. Slimmer not be the case.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от voloviks

Not fresh colors and subtle, exquisite combination, rather than primitive stoplight.

And you are probably an artist. And, perhaps, of those who can not stand "tyubichnye" colors, straight lines.
I know of. For them, the main-complex "mixture" on the palette. However, often the entire creative fuse for this and ends. "Mixing" is-a complex, from "primitive traffic lights have already gone, but that's just a painting and not ... : D

[voloviks]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

And you probably an artist. And, perhaps, of those who can not stand "tyubichnye" colors, straight lines.
I know of. For them, the main-complex "mixture" on the palette. However, often the entire creative fuse for this and ends. "Mixing" is-a complex, from "primitive traffic lights have already gone, but that's just a painting and not ...

No, not an artist. Doctor. And what you rejoice?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от voloviks

And what you rejoice?

Rejoice?
Yes I my tears ... : (

[voloviks]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

I'm glad?
Yes I my tears ...

Judging by the smiles, your mood changes for no reason. Doctors called?

[LCR]

Сообщение от voloviks

For what it is you Denis disliked?

No fresh colors and subtle, exquisite combination, rather than primitive stoplight.

No, I really do not like Maurice Denis. "Primitive stoplight" (which sometimes I really even like it - see some representatives of German expressionism) look at Nabidov useless. Of course, everything is relative: Denis - a good artist. But compared with such brilliant figures like Bonnard, Vuillard and Denis seems amorphous, devoid of energy and very pretentious - a sort of mixture of Puvis de Chavannes with wallpaper Liberty

As for the price of Denis, which I just do not know. If the art world has some kind of justice, then surely much cheaper expressed above two of my favorites

[fross]

LCR, Denis is really worth is several times cheaper Bonnard and Vuillard.
A quick view price level, and completely free, you can:
http://www.findartinfo.com/search/li...1&pageno=1

For images already have to pay. Reason once again thank the creators of the site Artinvestment, quickly get used to the good.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от voloviks

your mood changes for no reason

Why did "without reason"?
And you? Talking with you is the reason ... : shy:

Сообщение от voloviks

doctor called?

You yourself have come without a call ...

Сообщение от LCR

But compared with such brilliant figures like Bonnard, Vuillard and Denis seems amorphous, devoid of energy and very pretentious -

But the group, he adds to their ... Or they stressed?
Lord, next to these shelves socialist realists ...
As Pushkin liked to say; "In a strange land and an old woman-the gift of God!": D

[LCR]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

But the group, he adds to their ... Or they stressed?
Lord, next to these shelves socialist realists ...
As Pushkin liked to say; "In a strange land and an old woman-the gift of God!": D

No, compared with well-manned regiments (or boarded shelves?) Socialist realists - how can you not agree?

I think such figures as Denis /Sérusier, on the one hand, and Bonnard /Vuillard, on the other hand, perfectly illustrate my premise that those who invents a different, usually much weaker than those who just wrote - it is My morning peak against gospodstvuyuschgo views of contemporary art: p