Fine Art from the investment point of view

[LCR]

Сообщение от Vladimir

  Shareware $ 100 invested at the beginning of 2002 in the work of de Stael, by October 2006 turned into 242 dollars. This is a good indicator for the artist, whose works are expensive and there is no reason to consider them undervalued. Particularly successful mature abstractions de Stael art galleries on the market may be worth 1,5-3 million dollars.

That is 29 times cheaper than Fresis Bacon.
At 8.5 times cheaper than Jeff Koons.
At 6 times cheaper than Jasper Johns.
And - to think that the humiliation is no limit - 2 times cheaper than Kabakov!


You understand: I absolutely, categorically disagreed with the assertion that "there is no reason to de Stael undervalued"

[qwerty]

Сообщение от LCR

I absolutely, categorically disagreed with the assertion that "there is no reason to de Stael undervalued"

Two of us.

[Meister]

Сообщение от qwerty

The two of us.

and I felt why not?

[LCR]

Сообщение от Meister

and I felt why not?

You - a traitor case lyrical abstraction, so do not attach themselves: rolleyes:

[Meister]

LCR, well, you are absolutely biased and accuse innocent

[Konstantin]

So, where were you stopped?
As for de Stael 1952-1955 period, prices still rise? In the two? In the three?
How many paintings have all this time?
And the rest of the period?

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от LCR

of which are expensive and there is no reason to consider them undervalued. Particularly successful mature abstractions de Stael art galleries on the market can cost 1,5-3 million dollars.

That is 29 times cheaper than Fresis Bacon.
At 8.5 times cheaper than Jeff Koons.
At 6 times cheaper than Jasper Johns.
And - to think that the humiliation is no limit - 2 times cheaper than Kabakov!


You understand: I absolutely, categorically disagrees with the assertion that "there is no reason to de Stael undervalued"

Well, pounced Just art in 2006, since then much water has flowed under the bridge. And much de Stael 3 million utek finally and irrevocably. In two years at least have doubled. Kabakov's work with the record de Stael could still "pobodatsya. But keep in mind that Kabakov registered so far only one such vyskokaya sale at auction - $ 6 million for a de Stael art galleries on the market is already an ordinary case. Qwerty, right? Progshnoz - prices for outstanding work in the short term can go up to 8-10 million dollars so that the de Stael could not survive. As for any decent artist.

De Stael I genuinely like, but compared with Bacon - not the eagle. Moreover, Bacon - artist of mass popularity, taken away on slogans, such as poppy as Warhol, Mondrian, Picasso, Haring. A de Stael - it's more fun for intellectuals. The name is not so loud.

I looked at the portraits de Stael published by LCR. However, in Pasternak like? Or think?

[MikhailK]

I agree with Vladimir, de Stael good PR and will be at the hearing, and even better work in the museums would have appeared and then 8 and 10 and even more will cost. Our "help". But little work ...........

[Meister]

Сообщение от Vladimir

price for outstanding work in the short term can reach 8-10 million dollars

I think within a year or two, if the auction will pop up, we see these prices. Artist truly outstanding and bright in the art of the 20 th century, even a small number of works he created in his unique style. The main problem of unknown de Stael, as said Vladimir, a small number of jobs - it has no market, so do not see much growth.
Vladimir, not so agree, it is impossible to find a very good de Stael 3 million while you can, and this is clearly a very good example of investment.