Yablonskaya Tetyana

[Tana]

Сообщение от ФЕОФАН Mukhin

Of course you can and even necessary! A. Gavdzinsky.

ФЕОФАН Mukhin in a way, it seems that someone wants to "cleanse" the forgery, so any suspicious things you can say, yes I did it recently bought from the artist himself for the big money, but he no longer recognizes her and blurted out "you want your name, it is not a fact, it is slander.
Aga, who had bought the day before for a lot of money and carried at auction for $ 1500,
main logical ...

you just "emptied" the name, last name is not a fact!
the facts that when, to whom the day before and for how much to sell the painting and then how it is not recognized, it is shown: receipt for money, a check for the sale of photos, to sell the painting by the artist (it straight from the studio that bought the day before and immediately taken to the Auction ????) and then it is to compare the auction, and then you give the surname, poured human filth, and where any claim to the evidence in the press had reported that Gavdzinsky AS not confirmed the authorship (if you want to give a link to the article), but whence comes the fact that he sold it to someone before and for big money?? so interested in this information!!

[Вивьен]

Сообщение от Mukhin ФЕОФАН

Of course you can and even necessary! A. Gavdzinsky.

And now, dear Theophanes Mukhin, let's have a serious talk. You specifically do I write only the name of the work that Gavdzinsky sold and from which refused. Not interested in any amount, nor the name of the person who allegedly bought or photo work. And if you do not, and you do not, then continue to ask such a heresy not to write. You - windbag, some arguments without facts. There is a forum for people who deserve respect, as it was ready to subscribe to every word. And you even on basic questions can not answer. If you already have declared themselves in this forum, then their words, and if not - so what's the meaning of your finding here? I have the impression that Gavdzinsky, which does not hurt a fly, something to spite you, plans for your broke, do not give make, or what?

[ФЕОФАН МУХИН]

Vivian, and you and have that same daughter - a failed artist?

[Vlasta]

Сообщение от ФЕОФАН Mukhin

Vivian, and you and have that same daughter - a failed artist?

Listen, and you not ashamed? You should understand that such statements are signing a verdict on the forum. And the forum users would be absolutely right, if you will be silently ignored - you talk to yourself. Sure you would not be bored: D

[Tana]

Сообщение от ФЕОФАН Mukhin

Vivian, and you and have that same daughter - a failed artist?

and this rudeness, when people have nothing more to say

[ФЕОФАН МУХИН]

Vlasta, I see you are not a frequent visitor to forume.Navernoe all information interesting you find yourself on the Internet and are able to independently proanalizirovat.Vy not a fan of disputes "about nothing" the same characters from books Nosov ending ecstasy of gratitude to each other and sometimes, for variety, the shrieking of women? Me too. A bored just lazy.
Now, in fact - about the "rude accusations." My friend was injured from Odessy.Emu been resolved konflikt.Kazhetsya he still communicates with his family on commercial lines, and I do not have the right to publish without the details.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

I was not feeling that ФЕОФАН Mukhin and VYACHESLAV-these are two Nike one participant.

[Tana]

Сообщение от ФЕОФАН Mukhin

was injured, my friend from Odessy.Emu been resolved konflikt.Kazhetsya he still communicates with his family on commercial lines, and I do not have the right to disclose the details without it.

ФЕОФАН Mukhin once the conflict is allowed and the parties are still talking, and perhaps the conflict did not exist, but only a misunderstanding (who do not happen).
  besides the familiar can be satisfied that the information appeared.

[Allena]

TheophanesMukhin, unsubstantiated accusations, and even under the guise of Nick, and even from behind "friend" that conflict is resolved is called gossip. A forum is not communal kitchen.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 1 minute[/color]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

I do not leave feeling that Feofan Mukhin and Vyacheslav is one party, two of Nick.

----- I do not think.

[Вивьен]

Сообщение от Mukhin ФЕОФАН

Vivian, and you and have that same daughter - a failed artist?

Not have guessed, I'm not an artist. And before you ask such a question, you would
  better first present themselves.

Сообщение от Mukhin ФЕОФАН

Now, in fact - about the "rude accusations." My friend was injured from Odessy.Emu been resolved konflikt.Kazhetsya he still communicates with his family on commercial lines, and I do not have the right to publish without details .

Thank you, now I can guess who you are. I do not expect you missed answers to their questions, I already know that answer you just have nothing. And the fact that you are in the commercial interest of their friends and so understandable.
  By the way, as far as Helena Gavdzinskaya failed artist can judge each http://www.grafikplus.com.ua/portfol..._vistavki.html

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

I do not leave feeling that Feofan Mukhin and Vyacheslav is one party, two of Nick.

These are two different people.

     Reply Feofan Mukhina no sense, its provocative questions and statements he is trying to get a response. It's time to "tie up" with this theme, but in the end I would like to put all the points of the i with the permission of the author's family to Feofanushke had nothing more to add. When the author did his solo exhibition in Kiev, initially he had a clear verbal agreement with a gallery "Charm" that this exhibition would not be commercial in nature. By preparing for a solo exhibition in Odessa to its 85-years and did not want to sell work. For the frame, catalogs and other related opening in Kiev Gavdzinsky settled for his work with the leadership of "Charm". On the second day after opening, the author is strongly suggested to sell the 50 papers, as there were willing to buy them (from those who attended the opening, and there were famous people, distinguished collectors, state. Officials, etc.), he refused to , as previously stated it did not work and had planned to put in Odessa. Here is the essence of "scandal".

    Second - about the repudiation, allegedly sold for big money work for Theophanes Mukhina answer that refers to "Old Dock". From the gallery "Charm" came to Odessa in the auction catalog in their hands and said: "Albin S., subscribe to the directory that is not your job." This work was written not Gavdzinskim, of course, as a soft, distant from the auctions, not versed in this business people are clearly seeing that the picture is not him, he did what he said. Roughly speaking, led to the provocation. "

     And third, Theophanes Mukhin not worth the little finger of Man, whom he accuses of their own interests, a man who survived the 30's, Man's, during the war, fighter pilots risk their lives for that such as Theophanes Mukhin could appear on light, a man who all his life have done nothing that gave nothing without asking for, a man who deserved to life when his name was called an art gallery, good man, a bright and sincere.