What direction? - Страница 2 - Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство

Glasha · 27.03.2009, 14:30

Цитата:

Сообщение от heir

easy question - if this thing fits, if it is viewed as an independent, in an artistic direction?

I do not understand why you need to insert into the artistic direction?
considered as an independent, individual style of present - you better try to find the author

наследник · 27.03.2009, 14:36

Цитата:

Сообщение от Glasha

I do not understand why you need to insert into the artistic direction?

Thank you for your question!
Because I - a curious man. And it is interesting to understand what is not know. And one name.

Кирилл Сызранский · 27.03.2009, 14:39

Цитата:

Сообщение от heir

this is not the direction that I do not undertake to determine,

In! Do you have a happy opportunity to "discover" a new direction.
Dare.

Glasha · 27.03.2009, 14:39

Цитата:

Сообщение от heir

Because I - a curious man. And it is interesting to understand something do not know.

laudable ... itself is the same

наследник · 27.03.2009, 14:52

Цитата:

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

There! Do you have a happy opportunity to "discover" a new direction.

Why do I have?

You! We !

Although, of course, understood the irony ....
But quoting in its proper context:

Цитата:

Сообщение от heir

... If this is not the direction that I do not undertake to determine, it's really, most likely, individual style of the author, demonstrated is not a sketch.

antip · 27.03.2009, 15:01

Цитата:

Сообщение от heir

reasoning

Цитата:

Сообщение от heir

fantasy

Цитата:

Сообщение от heir

artistic direction?

Цитата:

Сообщение от heir

supporter of unofficial art

But not all the simple and prosaic? Author "unpainted" was hard or
a fiddler vypivshi.Vot not dokrasil, that's not signed ... no longer in power was
completely issyaknuv as "creator."

Кирилл Сызранский · 27.03.2009, 15:03

Цитата:

Сообщение от heir

You!

are legion - I'm not one of them. (c)

Glasha · 27.03.2009, 15:04

antip, yet, as an option - paint ended ?....

наследник · 27.03.2009, 15:05

Цитата:

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

are legion - I am not one of them. (c)

I do not! (c)

Цитата:

Сообщение от antip

But not all the simple and prosaic? Author "unpainted" was hard or
a fiddler vypivshi.Vot not dokrasil, that's not signed ... no longer in power was
completely issyaknuv as "creator."

Good guess! And then the direction - "census and linny vmazok"

How you?

раскатов · 27.03.2009, 16:57

Heir wrote: White is not shedding fragments of the paint layer, and the unpainted bottom of the canvas.

This is an excerpt from an article on our site, the technique of Anatoly Zverev: "Consequently, much of the surface on the original works Zvereva remains unpainted. This kind of thing many accomplice did not know or did not pay attention, so their" pseudo-Zverev, "these" shortcomings " eliminated - the whole surface carefully so carefully painted over, without gaps.

27.03.2009, 15:04	Язык оригинала: Русский #18
Glasha Гуру Регистрация: 19.05.2008 Сообщений: 2,976 Спасибо: 9,079 Поблагодарили 4,731 раз(а) в 1,133 сообщениях Репутация: 7675	antip, yet, as an option - paint ended ?....

27.03.2009, 16:57	Язык оригинала: Русский #20
раскатов Гуру Регистрация: 08.01.2009 Сообщений: 1,424 Спасибо: 543 Поблагодарили 1,940 раз(а) в 474 сообщениях Записей в дневнике: 5 Репутация: 2950	Heir wrote: White is not shedding fragments of the paint layer, and the unpainted bottom of the canvas. This is an excerpt from an article on our site, the technique of Anatoly Zverev: "Consequently, much of the surface on the original works Zvereva remains unpainted. This kind of thing many accomplice did not know or did not pay attention, so their" pseudo-Zverev, "these" shortcomings " eliminated - the whole surface carefully so carefully painted over, without gaps.