Ivan Aivazovsky Painting

[vadim067]

I will be very grateful to you.
So you're saying that it's not Aivazovsky?
And who wrote it?
And I could not hide hats examination.
She was discharged in such a way as I scanned.

[Николай Левенко]

This operation occurs in a pair with the previously illustrated.
The first picture they are next.
And expert opinion also found fragments.

[Николай Левенко]

These three works, as well as the previous two with the signature red paint, do not have the chance of getting a positive expert opinion.

[vadim067]

Сообщение от Nikolai Levenko

These three works , as well as the previous two with the signature red paint , do not have the chance of getting a positive expert opinion .

And you can be curious - why? ? ? ? Or you do not like red .....? ? ? ? Whereas understand Opinion cover sheet you posted ? ? ? ? and I'll add another one? ? ? ? Please read the top paragraph.

[Николай Левенко]

Сообщение от vadim067; 2848231 "

Is it possible to be curious - why? ? Or you do not like the color red ..... ? ? Then how to understand the expert opinion ,

Expert opinion is important to the person who sells or buys. And believe it or not is a personal matter . I expressed my opinion on these pictures . For me in the autograph and color matters . But even here to write the date 1874 Aivazovsky tie can not.

[Артём]

Сообщение от Nicholas Levenko

This work occurs in conjunction with the previously shown.

Right.
I, too, they are.

As one shop with a picture.

[vadim067]

Сообщение от Artem

Exactly. I , too, they are.
As with one shop pictures .

They also have you .... <! - ~ 1 ~ -> <! - ~ 1 ~ -> <! - ~ 1 ~ -> I am very glad that you collect photo)) )
And what makes you say that these things are not authentic ? ? The fact that they are photographed next ? ? So it's because they are one person in the collection and not in the artist - copyist ))))

[Артём]

Сообщение от vadim067; 2848741 "

And what makes you say that these things are not authentic ? ? The fact that they are photographed next ????

No , what I put next to here. You vadim067, apparently missed. Kohl missed tell . In the post 20 shows a picture of Ivan Aivazovsky which was made ( compiled ) a bad fake. Why bad ? Because . IK Aivazovsky that had the talent , colossal school , experience , technique, which allowed him to get the job done quickly , easily , original method , which in turn is visible, consistent, calculate . When you apply one color batches , smear , glaze , the. When working memory mechanical arm, and not well thought-out accuracy.
The presented work is not responding to anything listed above. Glazing is not used at all. dexterity sluggish and inept , the objects in the picture are crooked, do not meet the laws of perspective and of academic painting in general. ( Photos again for comparison .)

[vadim067]

Сообщение от Nikolai Levenko

Let me disagree with you . Chemistry also found that emerald green , are used in the search pattern shown , came into use in 1869 , and the work is dated 1849 year. You deliberately did not show a cap expert opinion , or do not trust the National Research and Restoration Center , or check us. I'll show you the work from all angles , but Aivazovsky it has nothing to do . If interested in the following report will show another five works published from the same workshop .

And it would be interesting to know how did you get these angles ( I mean eight photos) The man who photographed them in 2007 just assured me that you should not predostavlyal.I that he does not know you at all .... ..? ? ? ?

Added after 4 minutes

Сообщение от Nikolai Levenko

This work occurs in tandem with the previously shown . The first picture they are next . And expert opinion also found fragments .

You want to say that this is not Aivazovsky ? ? ? ? Opinion on this work I have in full, but do not confuse it with the chemical analysis. On the analysis for this also no caps .....

[Pecheneg]

Сообщение от vadim067; 2848191 "

And it would be interesting to know how did you get those camera angles ( I mean eight photos) The man who photographed them in 2007 has just assured me that you should not predostavlyal.I that he does not know you at all ......?????

Dear vadim067 ... These two works , including pieces of paper were blown out , if my memory serves me on Ukrainian VIOLITI site somewhere with a half years ago and was exhibited at the discussion forum for the attribution of some person to assess for sale, where he swore that it did not work , and the type of friends living in Kiev, who asked him to sell it, because they need the money for expensive surgery .... He then advised to go to this forum artinvestment Where were asked not to tell tearful stories about the plight , expensive operations , and so on. etc. . etc. ... because , as stated in the board , then this is not love .. But then, if I remember correctly , espertiz was not ...
Unfortunately the link to this discussion can not give, it must have already gone to the archive forum.
It was not by accident you ?