Ivan Aivazovsky Painting
 

Zdravstvuyte.Hotelos to hear from members of the forum on this product.

Option "Kind of Vesuvius on a moonlit night."
Cardboard?


The painting to say, we need big picture, the frame is not required.

The size, material, turnover.
<! - ~ 1 ~ ->

That's the conclusion of

Too beautiful ...
<! - ~ 1 ~ ->

Chemistry, it appears, has found that the signature is not Aivazovsky.

What's the question?
<! - ~ 9 ~ ->

Yes, there is and chemistry do not have to.
IMHO, it's not him.

Chemistry has found that the signature on top of varnish ... same colors ... and at the same time ....
but never found out that it is not Aivazovsky

How is it? <! - ~ 3 ~ ->
Indeed, in chemistry it is clearly stated : the picture could not have been written before 1869. A signature on the Set 1849 .
Think it is so Aivazovsky signed such a joke ? <! - ~ 1 ~ ->
 Obviously, the picture made ​​no earlier than 1870 , supplied false signature
and without thinking put a few more years . <! - ~ 1 ~ ->
 Do not be a date there in 1849 , it was still used to invent all sorts of reasons -
why lacquer over the signature ... <! - ~ 9 ~ ->
 But , alas, with the date , rooms < ! - ~ 1 ~ ->

and here's another conclusion .....
which says that the picture painted in the second half ......
and not in 1869.
1869 - the year of the paint on the signature and not on writing

Chetarzhu <! - 6 ~ ~ ->

Let me disagree with you . Chemistry also found that emerald green , are used in the search pattern shown , came into use in 1869 , and the work is dated 1849 year. You deliberately did not show a cap expert opinion , or do not trust the National Research and Restoration Center , or check us. I'll show you the work from all angles , but Aivazovsky it has nothing to do . If interested in the following report will show another five works published from the same workshop.