Stonehenge. How are historical forgery

[Вивьен]

England . The post-war forties . It is necessary to rebuild the destroyed Hitler's bombing of cities and factories . However, a new construction site tsirkulnoy form does not look like the tab of the new plant .

Around for miles - an empty area. The land belongs to the Ministry of Defence of the United Kingdom. This is important , because outsiders will not be until the end of construction . You do not have to explain to the public: Why in the desert to build a railroad to nowhere.

It will create the greatest fake, that will make the whole world to respect the "ancient roots" of Anglo-Saxons and reviving the legend of King Arthur and Richard the Lionheart, and will outdo the supporters of the theory that England and Rome created the Slavs ...

The work will last about 10 years. About as much as the failure of other historical falsification - the tomb of Tutankhamun. Of course, to the greatest extent of fraud - Wall of China - far away, but the main thing - not the size , and the right public relations . And as Britain has learned to do it well . In parallel, prepare literature and "scientific" works , corrected library materials and the "ancient manuscripts ." The customer will be pleased.

Of course, such a long process of hard not to notice , and so the construction will be called restoration.

However , Christopher Chayppindeyl , curator of the Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology at Cambridge University, has publicly admitted that "almost all the stones were somehow moved and are now in the concrete ." But in the photos , we see not just moving stones, and moving " stones " with reinforced concrete filling, and only from the outside similar to the stones .

This means that the object " Stonehenge " reconstruction took place , rather than restoration and , in fact , Stonehenge is a " script " for exactly as much as we can say this in relation to newly built Cathedral of Christ the Savior in Moscow ...

     ... In other words, everything is clear. In the area protected by the British War Department , consciously and purposefully been erected this " center of ancient civilization," " the legacy of the great ancestors ," " Monument of Humanity" , which became ( not by itself , clearly the case ) the most important religious center for at least deliberately inculcated " spirituality " . There is no doubt that the most " heritage of mankind" and " spirituality " is an important attribute of the way this " heritage " and " science" developed around thereof " Heritage " on a colossal scale their "research ," one customer " .

     Professor Valery CHUDIN here[/URL]

[Pablo]

Vivian, djn
there are a few photos <! - ~ 1 ~ ->

[Jane Doe]

It's a shame that this issue has arisen in the section " Gazebo " where I basically do not come , as it has to do with art . But , after all, came in, because this article is about a fake Stonehenge commissioned by amateur sensation is itself a fake.

And the mystery of the fake art help us , and because of that I allowed myself to break the taboo and drop into the arena of political- bowline mega -guru.

Fans of sensations will argue that the old photos fake , as well as materials in the archives , too rigged. Uh-huh.

But art lovers will have to prove that the pictures John Constable (1776-1837), his eskizy and watercolors too fake . And also that the picture Edgar Barclay 1891 too fake , and John Uilliyama 1872 and Walter Uilliyamsa too.

Maybe the administration will carry the theme into sections dealing with the art , such as Art Kaleidoscope ?

108 photographs depicting the historic restoration of the ancient Stonehenge. http://www.amazfacts.com/2013/01/sto...-108-pics.html


In 1954 he took a massive restoration of the object with the replacement of the destroyed foundation stones were excavated (in the photo from the site , archaeologists are seen ) , the installation of new foundations , all carefully filmed and recorded all of the exact coordinates of that very clearly seen in the photos .

[sergejnowo]

Originally Posted by Vivienne, 2838161

Professor Valery CHUDIN

if scientists, and not only gain their knowledge only from the Internet, it turns out it is a "caramel".

Forums often inundated with discussions and statements, to which the information was gathered from the great "web".

Paul Joseph Gebels cried.

[Вивьен]

Originally Posted by Jane Doe; 2838201 "

But art lovers will have to prove that the paintings of John Constable (1776-1837) , his eskizy and watercolors too fake . And also, that the picture of Edgar Barclay 1891 too fake , and John Uilliyama , 1872, and Walter Uilliyamsa too.

Yes , here I absolutely agree. Just the whole trick is that people pay money to get there , bring home pictures from Stonehenge . It is clear that he was there, but in fact , it turns out that the megaliths , it is not native .
Acropolis , too, like " restored ."
I am now a couple of people who went there and said that if they had known that Stonehenge is reconstructed, it would not spend the money and did not go <! - ~ 1 ~ ->

[Jane Doe]

Originally Posted by Vivienne , 2838261 "

turns out that the megaliths , it is not native .

Just megaliths home , they carefully pulled from the ground, archaeologists searched the wreckage and then tried to restore all together. Where is the stone at the base has been lost entirely , carefully filled cavity with concrete, as shown in the pictures in nchala theme. A professor of the Internet's CHudinov nachudil so that he did not understand why the concrete into the stone.
By the way , a lot cheaper to find a natural stone, you make an artificial dummy.

Originally Posted by Vivienne , 2838261 "

Acropolis , too, like " restored ".

I believe that one of the problems of modern humanity is to maintain the historic values ​​of their ancestors. Stonehenge was almost destroyed by time. And like many ancient sites in need of restoration , or would take away from the face of the earth in a few generations.
Pizzanskuyu tower also strengthened and stabilized . And it has not lost tourist interest.
 
In all museums is under reconstruction and virtually all of the old pictures were and conservation and restoration, however , museums are streams of people who are also paying a money
Why we are on the subject of painting restoration ? Everyone knows the answer to those questions.

[sergejnowo]

Originally Posted by Vivienne , 2838261 "

I am now a couple of people who went there and said that if they had known that Stonehenge is reconstructed, it would not spend the money and did not go

this kind of pessimism and frustration with the time pass, rose-colored glasses syndrome .
Was once shocked when I learned that facing stone sand colors that shine in old Paris, stands a decent look , especially lately, is not more than 30-50 years. Or why a particular still life by the Dutch artist goes for $ 2 million , and the other , the original work is essentially one to one , finds buyer for 20 thousand. Or why the original 17th -century furniture , made ​​of softwood , is not suitable for domestic use or even restoration.

Added after 2 minutes 52 minutes
for rose-colored glasses , recalled the story .
About eight years ago , gathered with friends from St. Petersburg and Moscow on skiing in Garmisch .
Decided to devote one day and went to see the castles of Neuschwanstein and Linderhof .

http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9B%...5 %D0%BE%D1%84
Was deeply upset when he got into Neuschwanstein , the castle was completely new , both outside and inside.
Do not corner , not a piece of old , all modern work . Even a couple of tapestries , which were given to old, were plain fabric printing .
The driver, and we hired a small bus , listening to our bewilderment said nothing , now look Linderhof eat there all the old or antique .
Linderhof is the summer residence of Louis II. After watching the driver proudly asks , how , shocked ?
Guys with Peter saying "gut", the driver happy , they ask me , translate it , it's a faint resemblance to Peterhof. The driver asks in surprise , and why, than not please? I had to explain to him that the Peterhof in architecture and decoration , in principle , the same thing , but so is ten times more ..... <! - ~ 1 ~ ->

[annagavr]

Professor Valery CHUDIN

[Михалыч]

On the old photo shows a breakdown of archaeological and Professor, and really work and archaeological.
Why remake the creators of "digging" brushes to clear the squares?
Digging with shovels and a backhoe with a pick.

[NATA NOVA]

Title ( desperately ) needs to be adjusted ..

There is a very good new English Doc. film about new items found at Stonehenge . In a nutshell, this: it was rebuilt a few thousand years ago , and his story appears even more significant. Look , are sure to find this movie. (very interesting) .

The number one FULL WELL - nonsense , ( unworthy of attention and postirovaniya_imho ) .. CHudinov a troll - hacker okolonauchnom chtol ? ( Can not understand )
Why do these " In the style of headings " TN " News" in the AI ​​? ?