A few words about Pablo Almodovar

[Мунк]

Сообщение от Tit

Allow a few words from a fan, not burdened with neither the experience nor the theory ...
I think it is not correct to compare video art and painting in general. This is a different kind of art, using other means and pursuing other goals.
I would say that the pictures add time. It is more akin to cinema and photography. And the means and objectives of the impact on the viewer.
Actually, to my untrained opinion, no need to compare the actual, conceptual iskkusstvo, video art with painting.
At some stage of development (or degradation) of their paths diverged.
It's like comparing music and poetry.

  Already regretted that said Fross. I went to an understanding of video art from painting, rather than from photography. On the professional lecture about it is not claimed, but simply wrote their ideas for Fross. Think I certainly can not, despite the fact that someone thinks otherwise. Maybe you drill the definition of video art for more than "a different kind of art, using other means and pursuing other goals? For sim removed, because long realized that it is ungrateful (to express my thoughts here). Always someone easier potseplyatsya for words, say something "is not correct," than to write your answer to someone's question!
PS: The Art of Bill Viola and Wood - not conceptual (if understood by the "conceptualism" 2nd floor 20 at. In the West), and not actual (if by this we understand the topic, most acutely reflected the spirit of time). It is - timeless (judging by the subjects). I spoke only about him, not about the video-arte at all.

[Синица]

Сообщение от Munch

Maybe you expand the definition of video art for more than "a different kind of art, using other means and pursuing other goals? For sim removed, because long realized that it is ungrateful (to express my thoughts here). Always someone easier potseplyatsya for words, say something "is not correct," than to write your answer to someone's question!

Judging by the number of smilies you're joking. Of course, I did not want to "cling" and, of course, difficult to write a response - so I'm a reader. (Sorry, crept into your conversation, could not resist). And your thoughts are particularly interests, and it is rewarding.

Expand the definition of video art I can not - must be read or think too much. I have a painting does not understand. Do not always know how to distinguish good art from the weak.
  And if the "more detail", then "other means" - in contrast to the painting, which solves the problem of plastic (light, color, composition) through the canvas and paint - a moving picture, set up a camera and computer. Even if this cartoon.
"other purposes" - as opposed to painting which pleases (or care) eyes and feeling - excite the brain.
At least, in the examples cited by you, "exposure to the power of the senses - through the brain.
This "literariness" is not less than sots.realizm and itinerants.