Kurt Melech? Help assess the picture is about 180 years.

[AL160]

Signature is not lost, just the problem is that you need a place to straighten the bend, and after much can and fotografirokat different angles of light.


And the artistic handwriting have any idea?

[Борис Кон]

AL stoshestidesyaty, the picture you standing.
You also said.
This is enough to be a signature schastlivym.A You hardly decipher.
The artist probably missing.
Especially - Kurt, and sorry ...

In good frame to it, this gypsy.
Wonderful nature.
Simply magnificent!

[AL160]

Thank you, Boris Con !
She could hang on the wall , the eye pleasing. Constantly noticed that the eyes look at me , wherever and in whatever corner of the room , I was not. Colours are bright, sorry, I had to reduce the file size while downloading ... missing paint.
Yes, already found out that Kurt Melek is the name of the village , the signature slightly lower part of the signature on the edge.
And I would like to know its approximate value?
Can anyone help?

[Marassa]

Сообщение от AL160

And I would like to know its approximate value?

Can anyone help?

So the expertise to do it!
If it is true Myasoedov, it may be tens of thousands of dollars.
If not, then ...

[macas]

AL160, just not in a hurry to sell.
First, try to attribute, and then the examination can be done.

[AL160]

" ... not in a hurry to sell. First try to attribute , and then the examination can be done ."

I do not set it up for sale , it is one of the family pictures , some artists already set ... for me still remain unidentified three pictures ... eventually I will put on the forum.
I only have one doubt ... what are the risks of transmission mozhekt picture for examination , suddenly it Myasoedov and it will not be returned or such longer there?

[Marassa]

Сообщение от AL160

what are the risks of transmission mozhekt picture for examination

The risk is only in the fact that the examination of money stóit . If it turns out that it is not and never Myasoedov XIX century , you can do work at a loss .

what if it Myasoedov and it will not return

Well, it does not come back - whether that requisition in favor of working people ?

Added after 3 minutes
PS about the risk : there have already noted that the canvas was cut "to live" , which is suggestive of how , under what circumstances would anyone do that? If , God forbid , the picture cut the theft of some museum , and it is in the database of stolen , that's when it really can not go back to the examination .

[AL160]

Can you tell where in Moscow better conduct examination ?

Added after 5 minutes

Сообщение от Marassa

The risk is only in the fact that the examination of money stóit . If it turns out that it is not and never Myasoedov XIX century , you can do work at a loss .
So as not to come back - whether that requisition in favor of working people ?

[color="#666686 " ]Added after 3 minutes[/color]
PS about the risk : there have already noted that the canvas was cut "to live" , which is suggestive of how , under what circumstances would anyone do that? If , God forbid , the picture cut the theft of some museum , and it is in the database of stolen , that's when it really can not go back to the examination .

This just can not be , a picture hung on the wall as I can remember , years of about 60 , even great-grandfather got them by inheritance, so that just is not , some pictures he had received as a gift from the authors , some very bought ...

[AL160]

He sat on the history of the Crimea and its settlements. If Kurt is a village with milk Crimea either Nekrasovka ( Melek ), Lieb royal hill , they are far enough away from Sebastopol, for more than 200-250 km. Why did the artist have ... Sevastopol? It looks like this version and is crumbling. In the post was a recommendation " atributsirovat " picture , and only then to the expertise ... it's like ... what atributsirovat information about it to know?

I host several options photo byline ... and who can recognize it by the characteristic features of the autograph ?

[Балагур]

Сообщение от Boris Cohn

AL stoshestidesyaty , the picture you standing . You also said. This is enough to be a signature schastlivym.A You hardly decipher . The artist probably missing. Especially - Kurt, and sorry ...
In good frame to it, this gypsy . Wonderful nature. Simply magnificent !

I have another theory. I agree with all that the artist is strong enough. Hence the question - why would he sign to hide? He did not hide it and just sign it will be difficult to read. Most importantly, it is - a fragment , a part of the big picture. Please note : the face and the hair is completely spelled out , and the clothes and hands - no. This suggests that the artist clearly looks like the girl in the general composition of the future picture . Style, of course, and not feshinsky harlamovsky though, somewhere close. We must look for , be sure to search for the author !
Good luck!