New (art) MMM

[Vladimir]

A bad idea. Informed buyers (or at least properly frightened at specialized seminars on art- investment) to any art- MMM not vvyazhutsya . That is the threat of this will be focused on the least protected , least prepared audience - the meat for any pyramid. It is clear that this is no good end can not.

The real problem, as I understand it , is to pump up the market with money to send transactions and uncertain buyers realize that the market is a kind of life? Well, for that there are quite civilized mechanisms - such as collective investment funds , which have only be afoot . But in general it depends on the investment climate , on which to work. Improve it , by the way , it is the technical problem , all the regulations stated. There is no way that all sectors - stagnation and corruption, as in the art of all rushing.

[Магнолия]

I realized that the auctioneer-litsitatora (the guiding trading in the hall) in France do not teach.

[Konstantin]

Сообщение от Magnolia , 2423111"

answer, please, and for the first part of my question

Сообщение от Magnolia , 2423051 "

is not only informative value of paintings, but also ? another , which was assessed in the currency .

Do not quite understand what you need to answer that for the value of pattern is measured by money ?
If you strongly not to go into complex reasoning , the value of the picture , and in this concept as a deficit in the broadest sense. If you want a picture to have a lot of people, you will get it the one who pays the most. Simplistic view ? Well, partly , the other question is why this or that picture suddenly want to own a lot of people. Here list the reasons can be long.

[Магнолия]

Сообщение от Konstantin

another question why a particular picture suddenly want to own

That is "spin," a picture (or anything) can even just two very rich "buyer"?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от "Magnolia, 2423271 '

That is," roll "picture (or anything) can even just two very rich" buyer "?

Do not "roll" picture, and cheat the price for it.

[Konstantin]

Сообщение от Magnolia , 2423271 '

That is, " roll "picture ( or anything ) can even just two very rich" buyer "?

If an item ( such as a simple statue of Mars ) or a picture in a single and unique form ( da Vinci's Mona Lisa ) - yes.
Yes - a rarity and the solvency of applicants.
But why do so to simplify the question and therefore discussion?

[artcol]

Сообщение от Vladimir

was a bad idea. Informed buyers (or at least properly frightened at specialized seminars on art-investment) to any art-MMM not vvyazhutsya. That is the threat of this will be focused on the least protected, least prepared audience - the meat for any pyramid. It is clear that this is no good end can not.

The real problem, as I understand it, is to pump up the market with money to send transactions and uncertain buyers realize that the market is a kind of life? Well, for that there are quite civilized mechanisms - such as collective investment funds, which have only be afoot. But in general it depends on the investment climate, on which to work. Improve it, by the way, it is the technical problem, all the regulations stated. There is no way that all sectors - stagnation and corruption, as in the art of all rushing.

What's the idea? I have not announced it yet. Just did pounce the idea - look at the temperature in the hospital, so to speak. So while the findings do not really early, and not even about.

Now to the point. About real problem - I agree. Do not go there money. So we began to utter the magic spell: "collective investment funds - the investment climate - ..." etc. But few spells - need a mechanism. Mavrodi was here at such a mechanism, but a mathematician, not a "charmer texts."

Do not get me wrong - the texts are needed, I read your text, and there are many useful and interesting, but said generally believe only once. Unfortunately, the predictions about the growth of all things did not materialize, investors got burned, and now try to watch from a distance and wait for the "improvement of the investment climate."

Need a simple, transparent mechanism. Type mavrodievskoy pyramid. Not in shape and not on the basis, of course, but as an analogy working.

[mihailovoh]

artcol,
All products in the world MMM.krome pitaniya.vody td.chto and not aimed at the physical existence of the body.
Estimates give those. Who has dengi.a specifically in serious painting. Dengi.tk one else . it is not a necessity , and even just zhizneneobhodimym .
A pyramid Marvodievskaya no better and no worse than the rest of the pyramids.

[Konstantin]

Сообщение от artcol

Need a simple, transparent mechanism.

And all to be rich and healthy at the same time?

Good idea.
Just as an example of why taking Mavrodi?
Oil can be taken as an example, also works and is even better now.

[artcol]

Сообщение от mihailovoh

artcol,
All products in the world MMM.krome pitaniya.vody td.chto and not aimed at the physical existence of the body.
Estimates give those. Who has dengi.a in concrete in a serious painting. Dengi.tk one else. it is not a necessity, and even just zhizneneobhodimym.

mihailovoh, I know that.

I even know what you do not know > You just do not panic >

In general, write about all this a lot. In fact, the problem is reduced to the problem of the "philosopher's stone" > Actually, the art market, and this is interesting, and not as a way to earn money, "his family on a piece of bread" (c) the COP. Although, maybe I'm wrong? >

Added after 5 minutes

Сообщение от Konstantin

And all to be rich and healthy at the same time?
Good idea. Just as an example of why taking Mavrodi? Oil can be taken as an example, also works and even better yet.

I take the example of Mavrodi only that he created the working mechanism. Pyramid is not to blame. In my idea is not a pyramid, and can not be. MMM work, because to solve some very important issues at the time. So her and covered up. It is possible that Mavrodi raising money was not an end but a means.