Pyotr Konchalovsky

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Pavel

possible agreement between the auction and the owners until the rigging of prices that already seems at Sotheby's. Seems.

But I can not understand this. What is a "falsification of prices" and that the mysterious "arrangements between the auction and the owners," what? I passed, you sold? So it's normal, it is the goal of blood pressure.

[Pavel]

Akun shows the dynamics of change in prices for the artist at various auctions. The buyer sees the dynamics of the growth-buys, not on daily purchases. It happens that someone was being thrashed prices sharply - it opasno.Barometr.

[Pavel]

Model-if the portrait commissioned by and for him the artist received a fee, but copyright law is best left to the artist.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 2 minutes[/color]
If the author is dead tell me that he gave it to you, but I want to make you a better picture.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 28 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Well, I can not understand this. What is a "falsification of prices" and that the mysterious "arrangements between the auction and the owners," what? I passed, you sold? So it is normal, it is the goal of blood pressure.

Who sets the price at the auction, not the auctioneer, neestimason.ne buyer, and those who sit in the hall zale.V SIIT claque, gallery owners, antique dealers, owners. You do not buy anything there if they do not want to - they all know each other, sometimes related. If you want to buy what they need themselves, they raise the price-if-they will reduce themselves. They are all run by.

[Евгений]

Pavel, Here is the topic: creativity Pyotr Konchalovsky, about the auctions, gallery owners, start a new topic and they write their thoughts.
.

Сообщение от Pavel

In the hall SIIT claque, gallery owners, antique dealers, owners

Most of the forum is just the gallery owners, antique dealers, owners of the paintings, the artist's heirs Paul .. You are wrong.
P /S.K artists, I and virtually all forum members have great respect.

[Евгений]

Сообщение от OlgaV

who should belong to the portrait - the artist or the model? In response to this question and hidden answer to the question of assistance KM Benediktova

You're right, this is an interesting topic and it can make a separate post (the restitution of many interested) and they discuss it.

[Евгений]

Сообщение от OlgaV

artist - in terms of copyright, but may belong to, and models - on the basis of other rights prescribed by our Civil Code as well

Let's take an issue to discuss in a separate posting .. (This is purely legal issue).

[fross]

Сообщение от OlgaV

Eugene, that's right: the discussion began with a portrait Pebbles "- Camilla Markovna Benediktova, brushes PP Konchalovsky, who according to the participants can be found in the Kostroma Art Museum; have a photo of the model on the background of the portrait, is an affirmation Fund, which the model was donated to the reproduction, and there are statements of the forum, that probably is not right, and the person needs help.
Maybe you think that my question, too, must make a separate topic, I will repeat it: who should belong to the portrait - the artist or the model? In response to this question and hidden answer to the question of assistance KM Benediktova

And Camilla Markovna do know that she going to have this kind of help?

[Евгений]

Сообщение от fross

And Camilla Markovna do know that she going to have this kind of assistance?

fross, OlgaV, let's start a new topic "restitution" .. it is basically a legal issue and creativity PP Konchalovsky has no relevance.

[Синица]

Сообщение от OlgaV

WHO should belong PORTRAIT - artist and his written, or MODEL?

Has not yet made a separate topic, I will say here --
artist, of course, prinaldezhit.
The artist with the model of their arrangement - he either pays model to work, or it amicable agreement, or "order" model.
A portrait of himself can already sell or donate.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 5 minutes[/color]
I own портретик here does not redeem the artist - all put out (to whom he is, except me, should be).