Socialist realism - this is our antiques

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Originally Posted by Konstantin

after a certain threshold of the 20 million that 100 million the amount equally outrageous.

For me, for example, the amount and at one million dollars exorbitant.
>

[Konstantin]

Originally Posted by Cyril Syzran

For me, for example, the amount and at one million dollars prohibitive.

I hope all the same until.

[Лен-Гор]

Originally Posted by Cyril Syzran ; 2342261"

Yeah , except that the world did not know him then and still does not know

It is not the correct statement.
It is the exhibition of Socialist Realism arouse great interest in the West.
In the last five years, we have conducted a large-scale exhibition of the Tretyakov Gallery , GIMom , RosIZO in Europe. Attendance rolls over.
Italians are so simple "attack" with offers of repeating last year's exhibition of Socialist Realism in Italy.
Germany "request" to include such an exhibition in the plan for the year 2013-2014 . , About China, I not even talking - their only Lenin on canvases and interests.
So , the rumors of the "death" of socialist realism exaggerated >

[Konstantin]

Originally Posted by Len-Gore, 2342911

So, the rumors of the "death" of socialist realism greatly exaggerated

Why, then, this area is not at Western auctions?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Originally Posted by Len-Gore, 2342911

This is the exhibition of Socialist Realism arouse great interest in the West.

That speech brodatyh women caused great interest of the audience of the circus, and the most viewed websites, they say, is pornography.
>

So what?

[artcol]

Originally Posted by Igor Guryev

Of course.

Because modernism - totally immoral thing.

As Brodsky (Isaac) too.


And it's the only thing they have in common.

This may be true.
But as the style of socialist realism is dead, and the criteria of morality we especially do not add anything to the understanding of social realism as noumenon.

[Grigory]

Originally Posted by Cyril Syzran

He died a long time.

Originally Posted by artcol

But as the style of socialist realism is dead

Well, at least in this you agree with each other!
>

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Originally Posted by Grigory

Well, at least in this you agree with each other!
>

Young people listen to elders, it is good.
>

[artcol]

Originally Posted by Konstantin

Why, then, this area is not at Western auctions?

And why Gregory topic moved to "art direction"?

So this will be the answer to your question.

Actually, I have a subject came up a large full-time and part-time discussions with the say so of the Saratov unofficial art of the Soviet period (yes, there are such). In the end, you come to the conclusion that it was not relevant to the artistic and historical aspect loses value over time. The bottom line still remains ...

Added after 3 minutes

Originally Posted by Grigory

Well, at least in this you agree with each other! >

So it is a medical fact, what is there to argue?

Realism please read in quotes, not to dwell on the question of terms.

And one more remark:
I would like to discuss the issue as well and in the future, ie not in terms of how that is now worth, and how much you can earn is hanging on the wall of the client , but in general. In short, an interesting discussion on the merits, because it comes across an interesting material for the second wish is to give the most notorious of those five, etc., but that is the point to keep? Something like that.

[Самвел]

Originally Posted by Cyril Syzran; 2342261"

socialist state podderzhivlo and containing exclusively "the art of socialist realism".

It's thought that this is so, but in reality it was far tak.Ya just met with the artist of that generation, they were different people. For all that, she had a son committed suicide. First in a psychiatric hospital and then, as so often happened with the free people especially in those vremena.U she had reason to dislike the state. From the point of view of life as an artist, she was very happy with the living conditions of these artists. These constant trips, meetings with different cultures, something new each time, as if there is no state, it does not stop them, they lived their separate from the state, the artist's life. They were often at odds, to defend their position, color Somebody, somebody perspective, someone with his love, and some sadness. These were whole teams of artists from different directions.

Originally Posted by Cyril Syzran; 2342261"

Yeah, except that the world did not know him then and still does not know and, I think, never know, with the exception, perhaps, meager number of specialists - art historians and the same number lovers.

But it took only 30 years and if there is even a shred of experts and fans, this is great progress.

Originally Posted by Cyril Syzran; 2342261"

you about the art of the twentieth century, judging by antique shops in the CHA, which is held in Moscow twice a year?

Yes, and the antique shops too.