Why forbid photography pictures with flash? - Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство

nikola · 14-07-2008, 20:59

In February, walked through the halls of the Louvre, take pictures of everything. Near Mona Lisa's crowd
removed. Do not disturb employees influence of light on the safety of products.
Light, humidity, temperature in the great number of visitors seems
not constant. Probably works Louvre printed everywhere where only
and can be photographed on the business is not affected. Consider blocking pictures
GREAT Lease. For those who shot and I'm including it did not come to enjoy
genius of Leonardo, and bring friends photos as proof. (I saw her.)
Pastel drawing for many years. I know that this is one of the most durable technique.
Color relationships do not change the laws of chemistry. (crayons not fade)
More affect the quality of the selected bases and soil. Bacteria often destroys cardboard, paper and cardboard. It seems everywhere the most terrible and dangerous they are.
And if the product before you created 5 centuries ago and it is still fine, I think it is not because it had not been influenced by light.
But the need to preserve pictures! Not less than their health. At the outbreak of vision
affect accuracy.

Vladimir · 15-07-2008, 12:57

Quote:

Originally Posted by nikola

pictures of everything. Near Mona Lisa's crowd
removed. Do not disturb employees influence of light on the safety of works.

Here is the normal approach to the museum business - take the extra money, but do not spoil the pleasure of people. And we have seen the museum degenerated into fighting. I remember five years ago came to the Russian Museum. The heat was terrible, was with a bottle of water - not allowed to enter with her, spoke about the mode of constant humidity, temperature regime and other blizzard. Well, come - in every other room windows open, air-conditioning nafig together with temperature and humidity conditions. So there is a feeling that the question still in the harmfulness. It's a pity that the technology has not yet responded: (

ACG · 29-07-2008, 00:34

Vladimir
Sorry, that long did not answer. The end of July holiday.
Of course, I'll ask technologists, but from my point of view, damage to the product of an outbreak is not harmful. Paintings and drawings by fear, basically, only prolonged heat. On this, the microscope is used cold, diode light. Museum bans are likely to relate not to the possible damage to the exhibits, and the impact of the outbreak to the sensors of security and fire alarms.

Евгений · 29-07-2008, 10:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by ACG

long-term heat exposure.

However, watercolors, pastels, and especially .. just fade in the light (heat is not being). Volodya and asked why?

Konstantin · 30-07-2008, 17:17

When riding on an excursion to the Church of St. Nicholas, he is Nicholas Ugodnik and he is Santa Claus. Is a church in Turkey.
Guide asked not to remove the frescoes in the church with flash, because fade from strong light.
From Mona Lisa's true - all photographed, and the picture is small and very dark. But it was ten years ago. Anyone who has seen recently? Same?

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Why different prices for examination?	Glasha	Appraisal	32	03-03-2009 18:35
Why am I not search for the auction?	Алёна	Discuss the Site and the Forum	1	15-04-2008 08:03

14-07-2008, 20:59	Original language: Russian #1
nikola Авторитет Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: нижний тагил Posts: 899 Thanks: 916 Thanked 1,272 Times in 318 Posts Reputation: 1635	In February, walked through the halls of the Louvre, take pictures of everything. Near Mona Lisa's crowd removed. Do not disturb employees influence of light on the safety of products. Light, humidity, temperature in the great number of visitors seems not constant. Probably works Louvre printed everywhere where only and can be photographed on the business is not affected. Consider blocking pictures GREAT Lease. For those who shot and I'm including it did not come to enjoy genius of Leonardo, and bring friends photos as proof. (I saw her.) Pastel drawing for many years. I know that this is one of the most durable technique. Color relationships do not change the laws of chemistry. (crayons not fade) More affect the quality of the selected bases and soil. Bacteria often destroys cardboard, paper and cardboard. It seems everywhere the most terrible and dangerous they are. And if the product before you created 5 centuries ago and it is still fine, I think it is not because it had not been influenced by light. But the need to preserve pictures! Not less than their health. At the outbreak of vision affect accuracy.

29-07-2008, 00:34	Original language: Russian #3
ACG Пользователь Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Москва Posts: 54 Thanks: 0 Thanked 33 Times in 15 Posts Reputation: 46	Vladimir Sorry, that long did not answer. The end of July holiday. Of course, I'll ask technologists, but from my point of view, damage to the product of an outbreak is not harmful. Paintings and drawings by fear, basically, only prolonged heat. On this, the microscope is used cold, diode light. Museum bans are likely to relate not to the possible damage to the exhibits, and the impact of the outbreak to the sensors of security and fire alarms.

30-07-2008, 17:17	Original language: Russian #5
Konstantin Гуру Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 9,415 Thanks: 1,532 Thanked 29,854 Times in 6,714 Posts Blog Entries: 10 Reputation: 27272	When riding on an excursion to the Church of St. Nicholas, he is Nicholas Ugodnik and he is Santa Claus. Is a church in Turkey. Guide asked not to remove the frescoes in the church with flash, because fade from strong light. From Mona Lisa's true - all photographed, and the picture is small and very dark. But it was ten years ago. Anyone who has seen recently? Same?