Is it possible to protect from vandalism?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от zarajara

I'm like a beginner, from time to time (sometimes accidentally) hit it in a dialogue where we are talking about the fact that someone was banned for nothing, someone is indignant, offended, someone believes that he is" nothing ...", the old-timers understand what it was about, but not all the same old-timers.

Here is the opinion of one of the administrators:

Сообщение от Vladimir; 1076661"

To get the ban to grossly violate the rules of the forum (the agreement with them - a condition of registration on the forum). Ordinary misdemeanors - is insulting, criticism of the administration of a forum clumsy inciting hatred on the forum. Rarely - spam. And even more rarely - a full "inadequate", scare away normal people. Polite to users not in danger.

[zarajara]

Сообщение от SergeiSK

Intelligent people must swear, should be able to talk to him. Because it is a tradition of the great Russian language.

Did not agree with "should".
Maybe, need to understand that there is a tradition of the great Russian language. But not all tradition is so literally to follow, especially in writing and on a public site.
 I do not remember such a tradition at that time (most recently), when Russia was "the most reading."

Added after 2 minutes

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Here is the opinion of one of the administrators:

Yes, I like it for yourself and do not fear I do not have to insult people's habits.

Just read the topic, the idea, but what if ...

[Konstantin]

Сообщение от zarajara

all the reading and the role of censors can not escape.

That's it.

And often feel vospitalkoy in kindergarten.

[fabosch]

Сообщение от SergeiSK

[I] Intelligent people should swear

I'll have to remember, sounds good

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Art-lover; 193 155"

But why the forum should be ignorant, helpless victims of aggression ?

And I came after the close of this topic another question:

But why do certain people deserved to be helpless victims of aggression anonymous participants of our forum ?

After all, they do not come here to defend its name from the false libels sweeping the local " art historians " the masks nick- Neumann .
And dedulya37 will not rise from the grave and will not have to protect the reputation and honor of his father in his theme This is not Stozharau ! from the arrogant and cynical attempts to shove counterfeits Stozharov using the death of Alexander Vladimirovich.

[galatey]

Сообщение от Admin

Well, let's not so easy.

Yes, interested buyer may well be a theme of " I want to buy , but I doubt " (only I'm afraid that those of the same name will be set and navigate between them would be very difficult - as is happening now in the " Prices /evaluation" , but there this is permissible ).

But once again I ask my question : what if a third party expert, not a participant in the forum, I saw something questionable in the " for sale " and wanted specifically to join the forum to announce that things are not true ? And it is forbidden to do . It is hardly the man goes to the " Attribution " and it will create a special theme with a discussion of paintings, exhibited in the " for sale ". Especially good is that it will be very small .

Good day to all .
I have a question : Does not everyone (or almost) serious buyer insists on his own work with a specialist expertise that is trusted ?
In the sections " for sale " there are only two : the buyer and prodavets.Nu I think so ...

[Konstantin]

Сообщение от galatey

under "for sale" there are only two: the buyer and prodavets.Nu I think so ...

I do not understand your point.
What does it mean in the "sale" is only two?
I mean you can not leave comments?
Why, even as much as possible.

[igorr]

Colleagues and administration . Let us return to the subject of the rules relating specifically to the " sale " .

Watching section , I noticed that some of the participants , allow themselves completely voluntary comments on exposed artworks . It's one thing when the original issue for fraud , but quite another when they begin to discuss the price , the work itself , the legacy of the artist, and the level of its prices in other topic that is not designed for this .

In the sale, since this trade, such discussions should not be. In most forums on various subjects , the seller is free to offer their goods at any price , and it will attract customers or not is another question.

For example, in my topic , see the following comment , http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showpo...71&postcount=6

totally irrelevant , in my view . what this man at all the case to my prices and my topic?

sure that this rule is necessary, and very surprised that it is not in the list of rules section . namely prohibit discuss lots of sellers and prices on all issues - the post office, in a personal, mobile phone and so on. and for such discussions have other partitions .

[Konstantin]

Сообщение от igorr; 2890891"

In the sale, since this trade, such discussions should not be

It is a forum in the first place , so the discussions and comments to normal.
Otherwise arranged our auction - there is no debate , though on the forum again, nobody forbids to discuss any auction lot .

Added after 1 minute

Сообщение от igorr"

ban discuss lots of sellers and prices

What's to stop then placing falshakov an industrial scale ?

[igorr]

Сообщение от Konstantin

This is the forum in the first place, so the discussions and comments to normal.
Otherwise arranged our auction - there is no debate , though on the forum again, nobody forbids to discuss any auction lot .

Yeah, but because the forum is moderated . You close some threads blocking temporarily or permanently Some panelists . There is a rule that all those in the sale section should present the image - so you're protecting people from dubious offers . Well, why do this when you do not protect , at least once , sellers?

it's not a surprise to anyone that the world of art critics and a lot of opinions. one likes one another more. but if you allow each passing vykrivivat comments like "bad artist " " I do not like " and "I Vasey for 5 rubles buyin ' it just undermines the level of the most proschadki . it makes some bazaar , not a civilized market. You follow the same reputation ?

Think .. but it turns out some flea market <! - ~ 4 ~ - > yes and shows how this theme , created a long time and do not lose interest for 5 years , it is relevant (maybe not for everyone, but then the picture is far from offering all participants ) .

Added after 9 minutes

Сообщение от Konstantin

What's to stop then placing falshakov industrial scale ?

I think in the case of frank discussion falshakov acceptable.

I say ban the flood , not otosyaschihsya to discuss the exposed lot in expressing opinions about the significance or insignificance of the artist , and so at least worth discussion of prices accurately ban , it is generally a private matter.