Ivan Puni

[John Preston]

Сообщение от ksenjaru

And say, Tretkovka confirm if that resolves anything or just add another piece of paper and a folder to work?

It was the Russian experts and say exactly falshakov it or the original.

The well-known fact that in the West do not have good experts on Russian avant-garde.

[Wladzislaw]

Сообщение от John Preston

well-known fact that in the West do not have good experts on Russian avant-garde.

Does not it seem a little strange that phrase? ...

[John Preston]

Сообщение от Wladzislaw

Does not it seem a little strange that phrase? ...

Well, on Russian art as a whole ...
Is that better?
<! - 6 ~ ~ ->

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от John Preston; 2022681 '

That is , Russian experts and say exactly falshakov it or the original .

Well, only if there is a pigment that did not exist at the end of the 1910s .
In terms of stylistic and, as they say, " the technical and technological " ( the term crazy , but settled down ), there is nothing to say, such variation is almost indistinguishable from things Puni geometrically abstract poshiba can draw on samples of almost any graduate high school art .

In the picture of me personally the impression that it was written by Puni , did not produce.
These geometric things too easy for counterfeiting , it is possible to buy only if there is IRON provenance or photo evidence ( such as an artist against the backdrop of this picture ).

Do it without provenance - throwing good money after bad .
Is the buyer did not know this simple thing ?
200 000 euros - for whom he likes - money.

[ksenjaru]

Сообщение от Guriev , Igor ; 2023171 '

Is the buyer did not know this simple thing ?

Igor , thank you. As I wrote , he hastened . Since the catalog put that work in the collection Berninger it seemed to him that the fact of undisputed provenance . And now there is a letter from a professor , that the work of his artist. After all, Professor . berninger monitors all work Puni , who were with him in the studio.

[khmelev]

" Berninger Professor " is a former football player and businessman , who inherited all the property of Xenia Boguslavsky and become an "expert" at Puni . It is really a wonderful collection of Puni , but - man is weak - it was his "improve" falshakov buying and then selling them as a " house of Puni ." These things he does not sell , so that the findings do yourself <! - ~ 1 ~ ->

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от John Preston; 2022511"

Marshall Center . Academician Grabar and his NINE . P.M.Tretyakova , I think, will be able to answer the questions you raised ...

And I think the timing "will be able to answer the questions you raised ."
Thing discussed

circa 1917-1918

, the whole dootezdovsky Puni them .
Or if you really in Moscow, to Academician Sarabianov , Dmitry - the author of a monograph on the Puni , an expert is not worse than that Herman and Berninger as well , I think .

[John Preston]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran

Or if you really in Moscow, to Academician Sarabianov

Which, strictly speaking, the number of consultants in the NINE ...
<! - ~ 7 ~ ->

[ksenjaru]

Сообщение от Kirill Syzran

Or if you really in Moscow, to Academician Sarabianov, Dmitry

Cyril, thanks.
And do not tell me where to find it and how to contact them?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от ksenjaru; 2022751"

And do not tell me where to find it and how to contact them ?

But :

Сообщение от John Preston

Which, in fact, the number of consultants in the NINE ... <! - ~ 7 ~ ->

or call them [/URL], maybe they will take on the organization of consultation meetings with the DV is Sarabianov .
Interested , as I understood , not just paper, and the answer is "it is not it" , even if oral, but responsible .