How to unleash the artist

[Veronic]

Сообщение от DOS

I have my doubts that you can some of the artist now "roll out".
Because it is necessary that there was someone (for whom) to untwist. And besides the participants of this forum
people interested in art in Russia is very small: (: o: cool:

Market painting is not a mass art. Sometimes it's quite a few buyers.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 4 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от DOS

I often meet with "local" promotion - for example, "Art-Manege" any
artist of the year to sell on the same bench, and prices increase.
A constant audience asked - that unwound your artist?
Well, yes, answers stands, - spin up, prices are rising. Buy, more expensive
be!
  Well, or in the same way on Rublevke can act.
But a hundred paces from these "points" anyway this artist never be known, because
in Russian there are few who are talking.

Of course, this is also a kind of promotion, why not? The artist creates, and a great believer that after death surely will come fame, and if does not come? It turns out that the whole life in vain, and no one but family will not see his picture?

As for "in Russian, few talking ".... why would not dare, and do not aim a blow to other countries? What stops .... opinions? And if you try it do not be afraid of?

Incidentally, one example of the promotion ....... on the magazine "Correspondent" (Ukraine )...... about the appearance on the art market, previously unknown to the Chinese and their art
"Even a dock, known as a gallerist and collector Charles Saatchi, has underestimated the artists in their time of communist China. A few years ago he called their works kitsch. But an offensive Asians in the global art market has forced Maitre change their minds.
To catch up, the first exhibition in its new gallery, opened in October 2008 in London, Saatchi dedicated to the Chinese. "They have enough decent things for a good show," he commented, his decision. "

[Meister]

Сообщение от Veronic

Saatchi dedicated to the Chinese. "They have enough decent things for a good show," he commented, his decision. "

Saatchi, first and foremost a businessman. And he understands that this can make very decent money.

[DOS]

Сообщение от Veronic

Incidentally, one example of the promotion ....... on the magazine "Correspondent" (Ukraine )...... about the appearance on the art market, previously unknown to the Chinese and their art
"Even a dock, known as a gallery owner and collector Charles Saatchi, has underestimated the artists in their time of Communist China.."

Law of advertising: "Good advertising quickly kills a bad product."
TE if in the case of the Chinese had nothing to untwist, no Saatchi would not have unwound. China rushes to world leaders and as a consequence, to take the initiative in various fields - are they for this energy (I do not mean "shustrost" and the spiritual, national energy). Her (energy), they reflect on canvas (WPI for banality).

[Meister]

Сообщение от DOS

if in the case with the Chinese had nothing to untwist, no Saatchi would not have unwound.

we are on the forum I think somewhere a long discussion and came to the conclusion that it is the unwind can be anything ... the question to what quantities. I'm not saying that the Chinese are mediocre ... I have a question of promotion.

[Ninni]

Сообщение от Meister

Saatchi, first and foremost a businessman. And he understands that this can make very decent money.

You're right.
Spins the fact that good (mostly) or something that very much "raskrutchiku" (rare).
Chinese - it is profitable.
The Chinese have a different psychology - conveyor production of the grain in all industries and art is no exception. For business this is ideal - the price is very plastic, ambitions exist (if at all) only for business purposes, assign someone else's ideas - does not deliver them pangs of conscience, etc. and the one who will speak on "High and identity" is always there.
Business benefit from this but the art hardly ...: rolleyes:

[Meister]

Сообщение от Ninni

Chinese - it is profitable.

aha, while the Chinese are very profitable to sell, because before the crisis, they were willing to pay huge money for his art ... bought it from the Europeans ...

[DOS]

Сообщение от Meister

we on the forum I think somewhere a long discussion and came to the conclusion that it is the unwind can be anything ... the question to what quantities. I'm not saying that the Chinese are mediocre ... I have a question of promotion.

  Well, let's say, can spin anyone but why?
The same Saatchi Nav understands that the "good" thing pound \ dollar invested,
and shear coupons. A Start untwist the goods with the CHA-tion embankment --
and end careers. And like the convenient location - (on the waterfront) - a lot of pictures, small prices, the ticket is cheaper than to China. Since Th is he in China Popper? Maybe he thought that not everything can spin the head to think, on the sides to look at mediocrities not spend the money?
  And yet - what he did to us Chinese unwind? No-thing.
Simply Chinese issk. to lift, and he is one of the first saw.

And yet - well, who in Russia unwound? Here's an example, my favorite Sovrem. artist Katya Medvedev - (repeat regalia, somewhere enumerated) Personal exhibition in all four major museums in Russia, a personal exhibition at the Museum Orsay (Paris), some sort of special status by UNESCO (such as national treasures), art is fantastic, the scale of the individual - a stunning (all who see her in this agreement, and I am honored to be familiar) - prices from 2500-3000 for the 70x60, many specialists in the front row next to it and not put anyone, because a huge distance - and? ?????????? Ou, investors, whom Medvedev? I know where much of the first selection and inexpensively.
  Or maybe someone wants to untwist it? This is not "anyone".

  No, we will invest in the fourth series of dismal
  socialist realism. Type reliably. And in my opinion, about Socialist Realism in 20 years and do not remember anybody. (I do not mean
all the artists of that time, namely the "socialist realists" - artists, morally defeated the system. Who needs the losers? Another thing "defiant. Meet Aaron Lyumkisom, for example).

Received several muddled - извените, just worried that in Russia no good artists do not spiral
or indeed any art (though would not even bad) does not spin.
Saatchi, the Chinese - do not live here and not here unwound.

[Самвел]

Сообщение от DOS

A Start untwist goods with CHA-tion embankment --
and end careers.

I would not say that-be. Take the worst drawer in the embankment. We invite you to Moscow, well, like what some actress /A. Jolie /, and it "suddenly", buys a few works of this artist, and then writes about it all the press, etc. The fact that this is the time, and all of today's artists at the time untwisted. Time is very short.

Сообщение от DOS

a special status by UNESCO (such as a national treasure), art is fantastic, the scale of personality - amazing

That is, all these insignia only going to harm the artist, I'm about the future. All these big words. For all become great, the Galina Vishnevskaya, the Valery Gergiev, etc. Although the background of today they are great.

Сообщение от DOS

artists, morally defeated system

What does this mean? People have families, and how it had to survive. Socialist realism can not be considered as one-sided.

[Tana]

Сообщение от DOS

  No, we will invest in the fourth series of dismal
  socialist realism. Type reliably. And in my opinion, about Socialist Realism in 20 years and do not remember anybody. (I do not mean
all the artists of that time, namely the "socialist realists" - artists, morally defeated the system. Who needs the losers? Another thing "defiant.

DOS But there are among the socialist realists, those who wrote so to speak for themselves, for a narrow circle (this is the work of thinking these are interesting, but not portraits of the leaders), well and "to order" (live-it had to be ), and about the Russian avant-garde, almost all of them were carried away by the revolution, supported her, posters, pictures, how many of them in praising the Russian Avant-garde "new life", all the petty-bourgeois critics, all the "gourmet", the same Russian academics, is another matter that then they are not sorry for the Soviet authorities ...
but in general I think is better to remove the prefix "Socialist" from artists who worked in the Soviet period, because not all work "to order" and not 100%.

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от DOS

solo exhibition at the Museum Orsay (Paris),

What was the show? When? Is there a catalog?