11.01.2009, 21:38
|
Язык оригинала: Русский
#28
|
Гуру
Регистрация: 09.11.2008
Сообщений: 3,850
Спасибо: 8,042
Поблагодарили 5,249 раз(а) в 1,399 сообщениях
Репутация: 8539
|
Цитата:
Сообщение от Admin
The question, incidentally, curious. If you start from the definition that art - is the product of a creative process, you will have to admit that, for example, painting, made from nature (landscape, still life, even a portrait), art is not. This can be called a craft, perhaps even executed masterfully and brilliantly, but not art. That is, artists, who are called brilliant draftsman, not necessarily the creators. Artisans, high-class - yes. But the creators ...
As you are such a seditious thought? Although convinced that I was not the first expressing her (just have not studied this issue in detail).
|
One of our esteemed Validating said: For me the most interesting in any art is that is "for" painting. However, it differs only Arts with a capital letter.
|
|
|