Art between the provocation, and cynicism

[nikola]

Сообщение от LCR

"just make you sell expensive" and unwavering star of the art market. His "The Golden Calf»

All that gray, primitive, secondary, surfactant is not immediately clear
aided eye. And this category fits most
created works of traditional (some academic) art.
Blame "Vanity Fair".
Who and where he said that art should bring only the aesthetic
pleasure? The world consists of black and white, beautiful, ugly,
life and death. and so on. and TP. That is what art should do.
Searches of harmony of body and soul.
I have not formed an accurate opinion on the works of Damien Hirst, to
watch creativity.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от nikola

I have not formed an accurate opinion on the works of Damien Hirst, to
watch the creativity.

But they got to the skull, and he more than anyone else, I think ... : D

[nikola]

Sculpture with a skull about the so-called "For the love of God"
Death, which laughs in your face.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

nikola, exactly.
For the Love of God
2007
Platinum, diamonds and human teeth
6 3 /4 x 5 x 7 1 /2 in. (17.1 x 12.7 x 19.1 cm)

[SAH]

Here are reflections on the theme "Modern art." E. Goloubovsky: I think the current avant-garde art casts a fine art in literature. It is all purely literary, philosophical, theatrical. This symbiosis theater and literature. Previously art struggled against literariness ... - Yes, strangely enough ... I have just come to mind an episode of Chaplinsky film. I think it is something that explains in what you said. In Chaplinsky, the movie, as always, the chase. Of course, Chaplin escapes, and police chased after him. In the heat of this mess, he jumps on any rides, spinning in a circle. Naturally, the range makes him frantically run towards traffic circle. Naturally, dazed police also jump on this circle. And so they run for some time. Then Chaplin, to check the balance of power, turns around and sees in horror that the police are about to grab him by the collar. He is ADD, and - on the strange! - A paradoxical situation: the police had already run away, as Chaplin pursues them.
Here is what you just said. The situation is quite paradoxical. That is what was considered a terrible vice, in any case, in a certain environment of good artists, and particularly violate the principles of socialist realism, and so forth, it was suddenly so good! This time. And secondly, what I began to speak. When the exhibition of paintings you suddenly see priknoplennye or glued pieces of typewritten text - to the board or even to something - but I did not feel surprised. Moreover, if it remained a surprise - it is still all right, but has a wild bore. And I afford to bring in this plan is one example. For example, a very famous artist Kabakov. With my light hand we had a slight controversy, instigated by the Union of Artists. It was a question about these very dangerous pirouette, which instigate young artists - of course, very advanced. So I asked them very simple. I will not mention names. I say: "Well, you certainly know this artist, avant-garde artist, who recently in America get some very large prestigious award. I'll call you to two of his works. One gray boards, which usually enlistment any chart hung or relating to the recruitment office attributes to such a board is nailed or, excuse me, prisobachena shovel. And the text: "Who is the shovel?". Left the text with the question, right answer: "Ivan Petrovich such a shovel. Well and other works. The situation - almost the same thing, only instead of shovels circle, but instead the question - again, the question "Who is the mug?" And - "Bertha Moiseyevna circle. So I ask them the question is entirely appropriate. This one of a series won an outstanding artist, very famous, indeed, the world has known. Of course, that two of his works must be very expensive. I will, so to speak, ideally give a million dollars and ask - but the conditions of iron - you should buy only one work of these two. What you take? Simple question. Alas, they all sat in galoshes. Because justify why he would take in one case, a mug, and in another case, a shovel, it is impossible. You understand. Here and there the answer to the question. Because after all, when we define and separate the art from the usual other areas, which is not art, still one of the attributes of this is preference. ))) Full version-EM Goloubovsky conversation with the artist Yuri Yegorov: http://www.slav-nonart.com/articles.php?page=18

[nikola]

Сообщение от SAH

there is an answer to the question. Because after all, when we define and separate the art from the usual other areas, which is not art,

Vl.S.Solovev
COMMON SENSE OF ART

Hence the triple task of art in general: 1) the direct objectification of the innermost definitions and qualities of a living idea, which can not be expressed in nature, and 2) the inspiration of the natural beauty and through it 3) the perpetuation of her individual events. This is the transformation of physical into the spiritual life, ie in such that, firstly, is in itself its word, and frankly, can be expressed directly outside, which, secondly, the ability to internally transform, spiritualize matter and truly in it embodied, and which, in the third place, free from power material process and therefore abides forever. The perfect embodiment of this spiritual completeness in our reality, the implementation of its absolute beauty, or the creation of a universal spiritual body is the supreme task of art.

[Art-lover]

Сообщение от nikola

Who and where he said that art should bring only aesthetic pleasure? The world consists of black and white, beautiful, ugly, life and death. and so on. and TP. That is what art should do.

nikola, You do yourself and answer the words Vl.S. Solovyov:

Сообщение от nikola

... The perfect embodiment of this spiritual completeness in our reality, the implementation of its absolute beauty, or the creation of a universal spiritual body is the supreme task of art.

For absolute beauty is precisely what needs to deliver the highest aesthetic pleasure ...

The next time the discussion leads to the most important questions: p
I wonder whether it would be and now have the usual consequences?

[Zenia]

Сообщение от nikola

Hence the triple task of art in general .......


...... The perfect embodiment of this spiritual completeness in our reality, the implementation of its absolute beauty, or the creation of a universal spiritual body is the supreme task of art.

I wish I allow deep divisions!!

Who makes such kind of problem in the art as a whole or for one artist?