Cubism

[Fed]

Decided to make a "loud" opinion about it, "Pi" only in connection with attempts to sell you other work under all known naprvleniya, but with BAD PHOTO. You are not looking at the promises have not improved:
http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showth...31#post1120931
http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=76841

If we take the manner of these efforts together and throw a bad version of the camera in your phone, then there is the idea of trying to divorce in a manner Ebeya.
This idea came while watching this work because She is very reminiscent of the formal modern vision of Cubism. It's like a modern artist would want to portray himself from the Italian primitives: - a la depict possible, but in their heads is no longer zalezesh, while another, so that leaves only a la.

From Cubism early 20 th century also took time, present-day brains. Hood. changed. Therefore, the work looks formally ebeevskoy. And the photo quality on the contrary are not shielded from this, and provoking analogy.
And in conjunction with your other attempts, suggests a search dupes, or probing the soil to improve the "creation" or attribution, and the subsequent search of these simpletons.
I do not blame the creative search of money, but also prostetski, soft (this forum) said. Must read books about successful fellow there all the techniques described. Why this rusish-gag.

If participants recognize in this picture of someone very great wonder. Then lay out even a homemade photo camera.

[Peter]

Fed, I, too, the impression formed.

[SergeiSK]

Сообщение от "Fed

Therefore, the work looks formally ebeevskoy

Agreed.
That's how it looks.
Most likely the author of this work "work" under Ivan Puni.
Even the signature of "PI" looks as an association, although Puni so did not sign.

[Fed]

Сообщение от "SergeiSK

I agree ...
author of this piece "worked" under

So they have achieved what they wanted.

[Сати]

Dear Fred,

Why did you would never, in addition, like all debase.
First: I appreciated some of the previous picture is already in Moscow. Your opinion is no divide. One picture was even more appreciated than I requested.
Second: You have asked the cultural (not the first attempt), and their attacks knock you all turn to hunt you.
Yes, I also suspect that this Puni, although he signed differently.
This painting was in the collection along with a picture Suetina. I think it's no coincidence.

We are talking about works isskusstva and not in the market potato trade.

Sincerely,

Sati

[Toinen]

Сообщение от "Sati

I also suspect that this Puni

I. Puni it looks like sour kvass the champagne!

[Fed]

Сообщение от Sati

Secondly: You have asked the cultural (not the first attempt), and their attacks knock you all turn to hunt you.

You see, I was just about this, "steeper, Virtue, to confuse want."
About what you asked me? Which attempts to treatment?
 What's my opinion no one section?
I'm in those discussions did not participate.
Since the estimated expensive painting Byuhtgera was whether or not sold at auction Shishkina? If not, why?

And then the potatoes?
Suetin already appeared. In general, all the mist comes.

[Сати]

Wow, you've been really following all events regarding my items.
I'm flattered.

At least, nobody alleged that "probably I painted that mentioned painting myself".
It's ridiculous.

I'd like also to emphasize that my words have no hidden meaning.

Have a nice day, dear Fred.

[OlegTsi]

Looking at the geometric shapes in the picture and signature of the PI my association is pi - 3.14.


Because the following known artists as

1 Odnoralov

2 Dvoentsev

3-tripolite

3.14 - PI

4 - Chetverikov

5 Pyatakova

6 - Shestakov

7-Semiradzki

8 Osmyorkin

9 - Ninth


It's simple.
Artist PI or 3.14

[олег назаров]

Сообщение от "Sati

We are talking about works isskusstva, but not in the market potato trade.

so if it's not about potatoes - make a normal picture!