There is an idea associated with the art

[LCR]

Сообщение от sss

And, this is strange: «In the case of already released a picture - at least in France - the rights holders can not prevent its publication by a third person, they can only seek monetary compensation ...»
Perhaps we are talking about the publication for informational purposes. Otherwise, the question arises: the place of publication, Circulation, amounts, dates, etc. on the fact of what happened.

Yes, of course, it is a publication for informational purposes.

Сообщение от sss

artist in 20 years, wrote a scene that he himself badly ndravilas, but ten years later, became annoying. Surely he has no right to prohibit its publication (play) just because it was made public, and is doomed for life

Certainly, the artist may prohibit display and piublikovat picture, which ceased to meet. He may even come to visit its owner, and rewrite it - such was the case

But his successors are no longer able to prohibit display or publish the already released a picture of the absence of clear indication of the artist himself (a testament, letters, diaries, etc.).