There is an idea associated with the art

[LCR]

Сообщение от Vladimir

No fig yourself! Liana is Russia's laws on such a thing? And if you purchase the artist's photographs from his work, this will count for the first show?

Yes, and in Russia's law (Civil Code, Part IV), and in the EU.
And of course, picture of the artist with his work does not change anything. In the extreme case, it may be evidence that the picture is not stolen, and that is not a fact.

But there are nuances. By law, the fact that the painting was exhibited, gives its holder to a free exhibit and publish it.

But in France there is the Law: Some lawyers believe that if the artist signed his painting, which means that he was ready to show it, and that ground has been some court decisions that give the owner the right to display their works without asking the consent of the copyright holder and did it without paying. Kok is the case with the signature in Russia, I do not know.

Actually, you should ask Selena, she certainly knows all this is 1000 times better than I am.
But still, about the first show I am sure that I say


I found the story of the Civil Code:

Article 1268. The right to disclosure of a work
1. The author has the right to release his work, ie the right to carry out the act or consent to the exercise of that first makes the work accessible to the public through its publication, public display, public performance, broadcasting or communication to cable or any other way.
This publication (the release of the light) is the issuance of copies of a work is a copy of a work in any material form, in sufficient quantity to meet the reasonable needs of the public because of the nature of the work.
2. The author, who handed over to another person under a contract for the use of the product is considered consent to the disclosure of this work.
3. The product is not promulgated in the life of the author, may be made public after his death by the owner of an exclusive right to work, if the disclosure is not contrary to the will of the author's work, express them in writing (in a will, letters, diaries and the like).

[Meister]

Сообщение от LCR

The product is not promulgated in the life of the author, may be made public after his death the holder the exclusive right to work

and purchase of work does not give me the exclusive right of ownership to work? she's kind of like moving into my property.

[dedulya37]

Meister,
2. The author, who handed over to another person under a contract for the use of the product is considered consent to the disclosure of this work

At least I understood that Buy and have an agreement transferring the ownership of the product.
But!
The copyright of the artist or his heirs belongs to them by law and disclosure must agree with the owners of copyright right.

[Meister]

Сообщение от dedulya37

The copyright of the artist or his heirs belongs to them by law and disclosure must be reconciled with copyright holders.

then theoretically heirs may overwhelm the owners claims and claim huge kickbacks for the right show? sounds absurd, frankly.

[dedulya37]

Сообщение от Meister

for the right show?

No-show on health.
Copyright imply permission to replication.

But generally it is better to ask OlguV, a lawyer and she understands better.

[Meister]

Yes, it is interesting to hear mnenine lawyer. If, for example, my work involved in the exhibition, which was printed catalog, which is The Draw products, it turns out that the right to print the catalog should have to give the heirs?

[dedulya37]

Meister,
It turns out so.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

A display of paintings on the forum, such as Internet publishing?

[dedulya37]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

A display of paintings on the forum, such as Internet publishing?

We (Russian) do not know how to count money, applies to all trust, and always assume the good in people too, and it distinguishes us from the "underdeveloped" in principle. In this, if you will, the Russian soul.
We are doing everything "at random" believing that anything goes or that no one will take advantage of our trust and negligence.
A "less developed" long accustomed to thinking "this is mine, and if so, then we can sell, if anyone should. And the laws on property they have invented, and the copyright, too, and we, as always, lag behind. And if catching up, it turns out "as always" (quoted Chernomyrdin), like the law on import-export. Like your thing, but take - horseradish.

Knowledgeable people "mark out" their thing "copyright" or "watermark" (maslovka.org), while others, like me - at random.
Some sites on the art also use "watermark", guess who?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от dedulya37

Some sites on the art also use "watermark", guess who?

But their (sites) many of these, with the "water marks", but if you hinted at this, I'm here these signs that something is not seen.