What do you think Sychkov?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от redbor

Incidentally, the hammer is not sold the original, but podlEnnik.

Is?

sale painting Sychkova FW
"Kohozny Bazaar 1937.

Canvas. Oil.
Size 1500h1200. Podlinnik.Lyubaya examination.

[dedulya37]

By the way, we see that one of the signature is, and have second to none.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от dedulya37

By the way, we see that one of the signature is, and have second to none.

I think at the museum's work, too, have just the picture it is not visible.

For copies of the same and it just stands out.

[artcol]

Lord, make clear: where is the image of selling work?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от artcol

Lord, make clear: where is the image of selling work?

The report № 1.

[redbor]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzranskiy

Is it?
sale painting Sychkova FW "Kohozny Bazaar 1937.
Canvas. Oil. Size 1500h1200. Podlinnik.Lyubaya examination.

Just killed! An hour ago podlEnnik was.
 Apparently, the seller reads topic corrected.
But once the original, you can take. Inexpensive fact. Strange. that the act zkspertizy not included.
And on the Gelos - may well be that the author's repetition.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от redbor

Apparently, the seller reads the subject, corrected.

Of course reading.
And not only him.

[artcol]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzranskiy

The report № 1.

And she put up and Hammers, and top-lot auction season Gelos.

It is strange that the photo-selling work on the hammer and Gelos differ.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от artcol

It is strange that the photo-selling work on the hammer and Gelos differ.

At Gelos picture real lot, but on the picture of the Hammers from Saransk museum.

[Самвел]

Сообщение от artcol

Strange that photo-selling work on the hammer and Gelos different

but in my opinion was not differ.
I mean that in a message Kiril Syzran.