Russian week in London

[Meister]

Yes, we actually both, discussing)) are waiting for these information events)))

[Grigory]

Сообщение от Vladimir

colleagues, is not it time to stop these bodaniya

I completely agree with Vladimir! Time ...

[Евгений]

Сообщение от Vladimir

I once wrote an article about Socialist Realism and looked shishkinskie catalogs, found in them the author's image (picture) to destkoy book "girl and an elephant", which I read in childhood. Nostalgia - she has such would have bought at auction with pleasure

Volodya on behalf of all fans, the classic Russian paintings .. always something to you personally and find a present .. you are one of the few on the forum who is a good word said about the Soviet painting.

[qwerty]

Eugene, what are you all still amateur juggle. All of our forum with pleasure discussing Russian art, including the Soviet. And nobody did not say a word against real masters, such as Pimenov, Deineka, Tabor, Kravchenko, etc. If someone is critical of the work of poor quality, unfortunately, ideologically savvy representatives of the social realism of such a great deal, you perceive it as a personal insult. And that you fell on the Russian avant-garde and non-conformists? Throughout the world, long, no one doubts that the Russian avant-garde - it's the only real and very significant contribution of Russia to world art, and the sixties have done the most interesting, from what was established during the Soviet era. Please try to be more objective. Our discussion has become comic, it's like to argue that it is better: our native Muscovite, or rotten Soviet foreign Mercedes, except that in this case, and Mercedes is our domestic product.

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от qwerty

Tabor

Favorski he even knocked a few of this series - only formally Soviet, aloof officialdom. I read that many members of the postwar informal art and young people considered him "their".

[Евгений]

Сообщение от qwerty

and the sixties have done the most interesting, from what was established under Soviet rule.

Complete nonsense, we are again on the tenth circle is discussing.

Сообщение от qwerty

y ideologically savvy representatives of social realism such a great deal, you perceive it as a personal insult

Kommunyak I hate the 70-ies, you are here again pravy.Chitayte carefully what I write, I like normal, classical Russian painting 1920-1940 gg.
And more on the subject have no desire to return.

[SergeiSK]

Сообщение от qwerty

that the Russian avant-garde - is the only real and very significant contribution of Russia in world art, and the sixties have done the most interesting, from what was established during the Soviet era.

The first assertion is clearly true, Russian avant-garde in the world known for more than a century Russian classics 18-19 With the second does not agree. The Soviet Union was, and became history, as Lenin, Che Guevara was popular in the world. And 70 years of official art in the Soviet Union was socialist realism, then this is also a historical fact. And it's the history of the sixties in history, their contribution to world art is too exaggerated, although there were bright extraordinary personality and their contribution to the art is significant, but not enough to declare them the person of Russian Culture in Soviet times.

Сообщение от Eugene

And more on the subject have no desire to return.

No! Yes!

[Самвел]

Сообщение от qwerty

This debate has become comic, it's like to argue that it is better: our own Soviet Moskvich or rotten foreign Mercedes

This statement does not climbing into any gate. Let's compare missiles or bombs, but not now, as during Soviet times.

Сообщение от qwerty

and the sixties have done the most interesting, from what was established during the Soviet era.

but it is nothing of the sixties as an element of promotion and nothing more. I understand that I nakinutsya even Rabin, or Bulatov, I can find them on any work personally for me they do not produce any.

[qwerty]

Сообщение от SergeiSK

The first assertion is clearly true, Russian avant-garde in the world known for more than a century Russian classics 18-19 With the second does not agree. The Soviet Union was, and became history, as Lenin, Che Guevara was popular in the world. And 70 years of official art in the Soviet Union was socialist realism, then this is also a historical fact. And it's the history of the sixties in history, their contribution to world art is too exaggerated, although there were bright extraordinary personality and their contribution to the art is significant, but not enough to declare them the person of Russian Culture in Soviet times.

Do not quite understand the connection between popular Che and socialist realism, okay miss. I want to clarify that I did not call the Sixties "face of Russian Culture in Soviet times" because of Rodchenko and Stepanova, and Drevin with Udaltsova, and Sokolov with Sofronova, and a group of "13", and many others worked in the thirties. It then There Were None, except for time-servers-socialist realists, and the rare quiet talents like Fonvizin, Tischler and Favorsky. The significance of the sixties - it is in non-conformism, respect for which, multiplied by the absolute talent of individuals like Krasnopevtsev and Sveshnikov, and he created the monument, where they are today, and are valid.

Samvel answer me nothing, Uel: (

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от OlgaV

If you hang in a series of ten works of academicians-socialist realists of similar subjects and close the signature, I'm afraid, even the experts can not accurately determine authorship.

Well, thank you, but I am suffering, suffering, force myself to "accurately determine, but not always get ...