Members of the Union of Artists of the USSR in 25-30 years

[Самвел]

[/QUOTE] Sometimes it certainly puts me, and I do not understand simple things, but here again, it did not understand. Why look for 1954 and 1964, and then 1989. (For example, was born in 1920, and a member of the Soviet Union, began in 1950) found a topic where talking about it. http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showth...891 & page = 3

[chealex]

Сообщение от Samvel

Sometimes of course puts me, and do not understand simple things, but here again, it did not understand. Why look for 1954 and 1964, and then 1989. (For example, was born in 1920, and a member of the Soviet Union, began in 1950) found a topic where talking about it. http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showth...891 & page = 3

R, by the way, my. It is ruled by both sides, just a directory of 1989 - is one of the options to determine the 25-30-year members of the SC, because when the directory - it is born in 1958 was 30 years (one year, give to the preparation of the book). Of course, your options are possible (eg born in 1920, and a member of the Soviet Union, began in 1950). You just need to take other directories. I have a 1968 for interest watched the first 500 members of the SC and of these only 5 - born in 1938 (Ie 30-year-olds) and 1-1940 born and the majority of applied arts. The one that the ratio is almost 1 /100.