What distinguishes the true artist from not present?

[Moriakoff]

Thank you for your attention ... As to the 5P. Probably a little nervous, missed, to be generous ...)) Now on.
Objection to the best genetics are not prinimayu.Chelovek should be healthy in every sense ... agree, otherwise it simply will not be able to live and create ... About Van Gogh can not say anything because in the biographical descriptions, nowhere provides specific medical documentation about his health ... And on there, sorry, and the court no ...
I regret that I did not understand the irony regarding the fact that an artist should not be quite lively ...)) Although some truth there, yet, there is ...
Oh ... these lovely "naive" artists ... Some people like them, someone no-matter of time and fashion. And who told you that they do not know how to draw?
The question of the real-unreal artist highly disputable ... You can talk for centuries ...)) But, sorry, you and the logical conclusion ... the need to submit, feel, look at this creature called "a true artist." Therefore I presented these punkty.Grubovato ... but at least something ... Do not agree - imagine your own!
After a group of people in a specific place at a particular time and under certain circumstances, may find the truth and to articulate their thoughts in general, fuzzy, and specifically. To anyone reading it could say: This artist is something something ... that is, and-then ...
Let these items will be more, but they will give the opportunity to present configuration ... Or am I wrong?