Holy Russia, Myth or Reality?

[tchaika]

More about Trotsky (Bronstein) from the article of his counsel Arcadia Davidovich Tenenbaum "Leon Trotsky - Tribune revolution":
"In world history there is hardly another political leader who in his homeland over the life of several generations, all the official propaganda branded as a traitor, spy and assassin. The main provocation trials of representatives of the old guard of Lenin invariably linked with his name. "

"... After resigning as the People's Commissar for Foreign Affairs (which he, the note, unsuccessfully spent three months), Trotsky was the surprise of many 14 March 1918 he was appointed People's Commissar for War, and later of Maritime Affairs. At the same time he also became chairman of the Supreme Military Council (later - the Revolutionary Military Council) of the republic. He compensated for the lack of deep knowledge of the military - in strategy, operational art and tactics - the ability of a broad political approach to defense and military construction, the ability of recruitment to senior military and political positions among the non-party military expertise and proven Communists. Combination of agitation and organization, the revolutionary example and repression has been made necessary change. From shaky unstable mass amassing revolutionary regiments ».
"Tens of thousands of military specialists served in the regiments, divisions and corps, was taught in military academies. Tragic was the fate of those military experts who have held top positions. The vast majority of them, attracted by the Red Army by Trotsky, after his departure in 1925 was subjected to harassment, and then repressed. "

«... The head of the military departments Trotsky believed that" you can not build an army without repression ". These repressions were expressed, on the one hand, the executions of deserters and cowards, and on the other - in the shootings of former officers who tried to go over to the whites. People's Commissar asked to take hostage the families of these officers. Far from justifying a policy of repression of Trotsky, I want to say that in the civil war, ruthlessness and cruelty on both sides is not an accident, and regularity. Acts of total violence during the civil wars were considered normal for the sake of political, ethnic and religious purposes. We do not know, to understand whether an intellectual and writer Trotsky deeply immoral practices of these bloody violence , if he remembered his stories condemning the brutality of the Balkan wars, but one thing is clear: in the affairs of Defence of the Revolution, he felt a moral all that contributed to her rescue and victory. President of the Revolutionary Military Council of the Republic with the approval of Moscow adopted the decision to create a dragon and arrange for the unstable parts of the fencing teams, which were required in the case of escape or unauthorized retreat to shoot at his . Stalin had created during the Great Patriotic War, detachments, reproduced in the new experience of civil war, Trotsky's proposal. http://magazines.russ.ru/slovo/2006/51/te32.html

[artcol]

Here's how it all ended at the agitators: they began to pray for health, finished for the repose.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

[artcol]

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от tchaika

Moreover, not unseemly. Especially in such terms. I do not think that your grandparents endorsed you in this.

One grandfather died of his wounds soon after the Civil (which involved, of course, on the White side), and the second in the 38-meter shot as "enemies of the people."
That is a legacy left Russia last of its king.
And another list of dead animals.
Hunter ...

[dedulya37]

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от dedulya37

Well, it is a diary he wrote for himself and not for the general public.

For myself, perhaps, but the content of these journals became available, we can see them a lot. You now see something positive in his daily "workout":

Сообщение от dedulya37

excellent training shooting snapshot

And someone else brought out, understood something about himself and the king as a person.

[tchaika]

There is significant research to prove on the basis of the actual materials that Nicholas II had abdicated the throne. See here: http://www.st-nikolas.orthodoxy.ru/n...tzar_sign.html
I just yesterday found this article. And indeed, there is simply no so-called "abdication" on stamped paper. There was a telegram to General Headquarters. Typewritten text on plain paper, which is located in the State. archives of Russia, signed in pencil for some reason (such a case the signature pencil was not for all the board of Sovereign!). In addition, the signature looks fake (other hand) when compared with the original signatures of Nicholas II. See for yourself.
From all this it follows that Tsar Nicholas II was betrayed and arrested illegally at the station "bottom".

- Telegram MV Alekseeva Emperor Nicholas II on the uprising in Petrograd. Submitted to GHQ March 1, 1917. GARF. F.601. Op.1. D.2094.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от tchaika

There is significant research to prove on the basis of the actual materials that Nicholas II had abdicated.

But nobody talked about it.
They faked his abdication, but he said nothing ...

A Guchkov and Shulgin also all figured out in denial they were not present did not result from Nicholas II to sign two decrees: the appointment of Prince Lvov head of government and the Grand Duke Nicholas the supreme commander of the king and signed and, as a manifesto they filled in the time of signature.

[Pavel]

Сообщение от tchaika

Do not worry, Cyril, it's not about you, Ivan Andreevich said: "Ah, pugs, know she is strong, that barks at the Elephant».

And who's the elephant? And a tiny dog who?

Added after 2 minutes

Сообщение от Cyril Syzranskiy

Yeah, and somebody quotations from personal diaries of Nicholas II did not like his own hand and writing.

Personally! His mother thought him incapable.