What distinguishes the true artist from not present?

[Peter]

Periodically, wonder, analiziruyu.Kogo can be called a real Hudozhnikom.Lyudey such prfessiey, or call themselves such mnogo.Smotryu different work razmyshlyayu.Prishel to the conclusion that this artist is a great ponyatie.Eto means not just to be able to accurately contour, not nice bar, not getting the tone and tsvet.Nastoyaschy artist intended to create art image Convincing: If you can not, it is not an artist, as a craftsman, a turner from iskusstva.Est friends who have good knowledge craft hudozhnika.Oni say, if I as an artist people have nothing to say, the surprise performance skill (to be in life, like this). It is not artists! Create an artistic image, that's valuable! why the artist is called to respect good poets, writers, film and theater director, actors, composers ... and artists.

[Артём]

[Peter]

[Артём]

[Peter]

Granted, this discussion will horosho.Vot work you put together a real Artist! Each created a convincing artistic image !

[dedulya37]

[Buscador]

Сообщение от Peter

This artist is a great ponyatie.Eto means not just to be able to accurately outline, not a nice bar, not getting the tone and tsvet.Nastoyaschy artist has to create Earnest art image: If you can not, then he not an artist, so-so-craftsman, from art turners

And yet, for you, it is above all a man who owns a profession (who can just hold circuit, knowing the value of each line in the figure, etc.) and then created his own artistic way through the emotions, rich inner world of spirituality .. . ... or possession of the profession could lose?

Сообщение от Peter

is Rembrandt, Mozart, Pushkin, Tolstoy, Francis Coppola, Tarantino, Chaplin, etc.

What shall we do with Shishkin, Dunayevsky, Mikhalkov, Jackie Chan ..... Are they - are not real?

Added after 9 minutes

Сообщение от Pavel

As for professionalism, there are two ways

On the professionalism of whom you speak? If the artist, the way one - work and you will appreciate the talent (in life or are no longer here again included a lot of factors - who you worked at a time if you were born ...). Often, artists are re-evaluating its ialant, and the audience, on the contrary, underestimates ... When these components are in equilibrium - the artist, as a rule, is popular in his lifetime. I think so!

[Peter]

Сообщение от Buscador

And yet, for you, it is above all a man who owns a profession (who can just hold circuit, knowing the value of each line in the figure, etc.), and then created his own artistic way, through the emotions, enriched with inner peace, spirituality ... or ... you can lose possession of the profession?

What shall we do with Shishkin, Dunayevsky, Mikhalkov, Jackie Chan .....

Well, I do not see contradictions ... The higher professional skill, the more opportunities for the artist to express his artistic vision, if only he would byl.Eto wide smysle.Etot idea is not necessarily literary narrative, the artist is a composite , plastic, of color, but God knows the end result kakoy.Vazhen-generated imagery, which we did not leave ravnodushnym.Vozmem the same "square" Malevicha.Dur the long run (where is the value of each line, klor and plastic, the tone and color?) And art image turned out! "Otherwise it would not be so worried about so many lyudey.A Katya Medvedev?" Nonsense or artist?-Artist! A Pirosmani?-Artist "Painter is a way of thinking and way of thinking so! Each year, tens hud.uchebnyh institutions produce artists by profession, artists become unity! And with Shishkin, Dunayevsky, Mikhalkov will not do anything, they are also an artist and it is quite dokazali.Naschet Jackie Chan do not know, but in a personal duel ... he probably would have convinced me. <! - ~ 1 ~-->.

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Peter

Well, I do not see contradictions ... The higher professional skill, the more opportunities for the artist to express his artistic vision, if only he would byl.Eto wide smysle.Etot idea is not necessarily literary narrative, for the artist is a composite, plastic, coloristic, but God knows the end result kakoy.Vazhen-generated imagery, which we did not leave ravnodushnym.Vozmem the same "square" Malevicha.Dur the long run (where is the value of each line, and plastic klor , tone and color?) And art image turned out! "Otherwise it would not be so worried about so many lyudey.A Katya Medvedev? Nonsense or artist?-artist! A Pirosmani?-artist! artist is a way of thinking and way of thinking so! Each year, tens of thin . schools produce artists by profession, artists become unity! And with Shishkin, Dunayevsky, Mikhalkov will not do anything, they are also an artist and it is quite dokazali.Naschet Jackie Chan does not know, but in a personal duel doubt ... he convinced me to .<!--~ a ~-->.

What exactly did Medvedev, except that its all they know? You compare it with Pirismani? But Pirosmani artist and it shows in the works, the artist with his glance of. Medvedev is simply a fan, without any merit. If you can prove otherwise, can be illustrated by examples.

[Fed]

Сообщение от Pavel

What exactly did Medvedev, except that its all they know? You compare it with Pirismani? But Pirosmani artist and it shows in the works

  Medvedev, a naive artist, they have main-expressiveness. You can not have them in order of size.
The last I brought Cartney Degas. He was, as you can see, too, can be with someone "pushing", but not likely, many give up such a picture at home, even without a signature.
  In the meantime, I know artists honored with merit, and "boring" pictures of the bargain, which simply do not need anyone. That's me to the fact that one of the advantages of the Medvedev-its apparent consumer qualities.
And about the techniques and vision of various artists again everyone else in the controversy and did not return.