Bronze Archipenko

[Martin]

Dear Sandro
your work is dated by the French period Archipenko, and I was greatly embarrassed the English version of spelling letters R, logically its French version at work at Atim
as for the known samples of his signature, then they just go with the French a capital R if guided by the examples in artprice.com, but possibly in the works of his American period, there were other options
States in the same Archipenko moved only in 1923 and given the dominance of French in this period hardly imagine how he could have known in 1911 about such spelling r as in your case

[color="# 666686"]Posted 6 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Wladzislaw

sculpture without a "Fund Archipenko" worth nothing. You can, of course, pay a couple thousand ye and hope.

Unfortunately, today the conclusion Archipenko Foundation does not guarantee the authenticity of the work, sometimes they are very questionable, alas ...

[Wladzislaw]

Сообщение от Martin

Unfortunately, today the conclusion Archipenko Foundation does not guarantee the authenticity of the work, sometimes they are very questionable, alas ...

Here are all satisfied, and you are not satisfied ...

If someone applies for a new casting a real conclusion, the Fund issued on the original work, then why the Fund is to blame? Such machinations enough. This is well known, and on the site there is even a list of facts known to them.

Fund no need to issue fake documents to work.