What is art?

[Peter]

Unfortunately now, such things as art, artwork, hudzhnik very razmyty.Dumayu, that without the art business here is not oboshlos.Kak distinguish art from blundering? Only developing your own taste, while developing sebya.Dlya I was always a tuning fork or point of departure was soperezhivaniya.esli sense it is, it is at least the art, if not .... maybe I'm up to it had not yet matured .

[sur]

"Why is the road that does not lead to the temple?" - Remember her grandmother from the film "Repentance"?






 Real art should lead us to the truth (God) and /or praise him, and the fruits of his labor.


 

 This is my definition of art. People with similar views on the world asking him to clarify and supplement, but disagree in principle, I ask not to comment on my words because I disagree with them in the axiomatics and above I have written.

[Любознательный]

sur,
I think that argument is missing.
There is a normal exchange of information on the world view of the term "art", which, in my opinion, enrich the outlook of each of the interlocutors.
The new nuances and other previously nepoznanymi.
This is you propose to argue on whether the poster (in contrast to the picture) art.
I believe that the poster "The Motherland" (?) Is a work of art. Millions of people joined with the author of a poster (unfortunately - can not remember his name) in his understanding of set topics, along with him experiencing grief and fear, and hatred.

I stand by my opinion that matters is the eternal and insoluble (regardless of the opponents).

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от inquisitive

Millions of people joined with the author of a poster (unfortunately - can not remember his full name)

Toidze Irakli Moiseevich (1902-1985), Georgian Soviet painter and graphic artist. People's Artist of the Georgian SSR (1980). Honored Artist of the RSFSR (1951). Winner of four Stalin Prizes (1941, 1948, 1949, 1951).

[sur]

I also believe that the dispute does not exist.



 "Who are we?
  

   Where are we?


   Where are we going? "

  
   Three main issues, according to Shakespeare, to be answered by mankind (man).


   Fully agree with him.












   
 P.S. Specify that a good landscape, still life, portrait, movie, book, etc. is nothing but a glorification of the Creator works .
 Appreciation of the beauty and harmony of the created world.

[Любознательный]

Сообщение от sur

"Real art should lead us to the truth (God) and /or glorify it, and the fruits of his labor.

I have something not quite understand your perception.
If you limit the scope of art religious theme, then where then is Shakespeare?
From his questions, contrary to religious dogma.
So you agree with Shakespeare or with church dogma?

[sur]

Сообщение от inquisitive

So you agree with Shakespeare, or with church dogma?

 I do not see any contradictions. I therefore said to myself these questions. I think that Shakespeare responded to them as well.


 Sorry, I may later added a postscript.

[Черномашенцев Владимир]

Сообщение от sur

 This art should lead us to the truth (God) and /or to glorify it and the fruits of his labor.

  This is my definition of art. People with similar views on the world asking him to clarify and supplement, but disagree in principle, I ask not to comment on my words because with them I disagree in the axioms and the above written by me.

I have an ideological agnostic, but I will not express their disagreement with your principles. You have every right to their own ideas.

But I want to point out that in terms of your Gd, God, Allah (located on seniority), it believes more than 1 billion people on planet Earth. You deny the rest of the art 4.5 billion? Buddhists, Hindus, sintonistam, atheists ....

[sur]

Сообщение от Chernomashentsev Vladimir

You deny others in the art of 4-5 billion? Buddhists, Hindus, sintonistam, atheists ..

 Man was created capable to do and you can admire beautiful creations of human hands (not forgetting that each person is itself a masterpiece).
 But I'm not interested in art that leads nowhere, do not answer or does not ask the right questions.
  When something is created, only to satisfy the pride and vanity, the creator, I'm not interested. To me this kind of art is no code of truth.

[Черномашенцев Владимир]

Сообщение от sur

  When something is created, only to satisfy the pride and vanity, the creator, I'm not interested. For me in this art is no code of truth.

Somehow it seems to me that our art is original for this was invented. Many masterpieces created to order to please the pride of a medieval lord. Either you want to praise God. Hundreds of years ago the art could be the fate of only a minuscule part of the people.

In our time art more freely on religion, ideology, money. More precisely, can be more freely ....