Вернуться   Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство > English forum > Investing in Art
 English | Русский Forum ARTinvestment.RU RSS Регистрация Дневники Справка Сообщество Сообщения за день Поиск

Investing in Art Share your opinion about the profitability of investments.

 
 
Опции темы Опции просмотра
Старый 30.04.2010, 19:40 Язык оригинала: Русский       #11
Banned
 
Регистрация: 25.07.2009
Адрес: Россия, Москва
Сообщений: 875
Спасибо: 1,092
Поблагодарили 1,381 раз(а) в 500 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 12
Репутация: 2191
По умолчанию Our triangle

Having looked closely enough theme, I noticed that the question of giving an artist known for (do not want to apply to art, the word "promotion") is considered mainly from two sides:

At issue in the first place are active artists, which is quite natural - high popularity guarantees both material and moral satisfaction from their work.
Second, actively promoting art dealers, gallery staff and thin. salons. They are also interested in fame and high prices of works sold by the artist.

Periodically, the two groups accuse each other of not understanding the laws of the market, poor performance, not necessarily, etc. etc. I look the part and accept the first one, then the other side, depending on the strength of concrete arguments and examples. Also, depending on their own experience of working as one, and with the other party. A very mixed experience. You see the truth then here and there.

In this dispute respected hand forget about me - a simple Russian collector. Or about the sensitive Ukrainian collector. Consider the art market in its fullness, for this we represent it in the form of triangle: "artist-collector-seller. Who is more important, what was first: the chicken or the egg?

There is an interesting gambit: an attempt to throw out that triangle artist completely destroys this figure. When we remove the Collector (the buyer), the triangle can be transformed into a simpler, but under certain conditions, self-contained figure. Call it, say, range. At such a figure was like the artistic process in the USSR, when the art market is almost non-existent. He painted, public museums and galleries showing, and the people watching. You remember about the Buyer with a capital letter - Hudfond? Granted, this is a big dream of the artist, but the art market it still will not name.

Now remove the triangle side seller - and the figure again is not dead, turned back into something like a circle. Or oval and, depending on which side is more chip away "blanket". Not fatal to the figures, but the market is shrinking dramatically, significantly limiting the opportunity for Buyer to meet new artists. Will suffer and artists, as is likely to be opportunities to raise prices solely through advertising and marketing, not talent. Perhaps this is the best.

Summary. Speaking on the topic, folks, do not forget to discuss not only their own interests, but keep in mind the interests of "Collector". Claims by a collector you may also be done.



Черномашенцев Владимир вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 3 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо Черномашенцев Владимир за это полезное сообщение:
Annamain (03.10.2010), tiffany (01.08.2010), Хранитель укропа (07.08.2013)
 


Ваши права в разделе
Вы не можете создавать новые темы
Вы не можете отвечать в темах
Вы не можете прикреплять вложения
Вы не можете редактировать свои сообщения

BB коды Вкл.
Смайлы Вкл.
[IMG] код Вкл.
HTML код Выкл.

Быстрый переход

Похожие темы
Тема Автор Разделы Ответов Последние сообщения
Refusal of a living artist from his work Meister Art Kaleidoscope 113 24.11.2017 14:59




Часовой пояс GMT +3, время: 14:58.
Telegram - Обратная связь - Обработка персональных данных - Архив - Вверх


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Перевод: zCarot