Orthodox realism (or the ability to write, draw)

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от Artem

And here the direction?

This Marusin theme (it's better to it)

[KaterinaMN]

NATA NOVA, about the guilt of time - that you are absolutely right. certainly - the instinct of self-preservation. By the way - those who have it do not work - well known - and very. but often the fate of them were very sad.

[Артём]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

is Marusin topic

I thought your!

[KaterinaMN]

Artem, then after a few of the other conversation going. Originally it was a question that contemporary art, unfortunately, almost forgotten technique of drawing and painting, in favor of "expression" of authors. Moreover - contemporary art in the West (and may be our already) his understanding - and painting - are often diametrically opposite positions.
About Stozharau or Gritsaya - general speech was not.
It was the only argument for that classic image is not a dogma to become world-renowned artist (Kandinsky, Malevich).
And of course you're right - lack of talent - a lack of talent. Regardless of the direction.
Look at the first text in the subject - there Natalia focus completely on the other was. Just read from the beginning theme - then all Page.

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от Artem

Quote:
Message from NATA NOVA
This topic Marusin

I thought your!

(Hee-hee) my theme, melody (about impersonality-Marusin )

Featureless and the truth was a lot (you called it the Titans ..)

[Артём]

Сообщение от KaterinaMN

here because some of the other conversation was

KaterinaMN, something you butter the butter smears. Initially, I responded to the words Marousi. And are you talking about? About Picasso, as he knew how to draw? Or the opinion of Repin? Post about anything that you should be able to paint, or that do not know how to draw? You show me a theme, and I show you the name of the site!

[KaterinaMN]

Artem, but you always communicate so aggressively? "
or a personal reaction to me today?
- If at me - something I had no intention of somehow offend you. If I you somehow hurt - do not know what - but I apologize.
- If it is your permanent way of communication, then I, for my peace of mind - try more with you in the discussions do not intersect.

I really showed you today, this subject, so as we were discussing with Natalia in personal correspondence, and after my public comments and, accordingly, update the topic and you caught the eye.

If you are curious - what I mean - it makes sense, read the topic in a row, the message behind the message - and everything will become clear. If you prefer to pick out individual pieces - of course the conversation turns fragmented.

If you recall the conversation, we talked about that, unfortunately, people realize the necessity of drawing, it is now much smaller and opposite - too many go on about the deceptive ease with contemporary art. that's about it.

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от KaterinaMN

was the only argument in defense of that classic design is not a dogma to the artist became internationally recognized (Kandinsky, Malevich).
And of course you're right - lack of talent - a lack of talent.

These two artists are you are.
Especially Kandinsky.
Dreary mediocrity.

Malevich, though a human was a genius, and Kandinsky - complete nonentity.

[fross]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

These two artists are you are.
Especially Kandinsky.
Dreary mediocrity.

Malevich, though a human was a genius, and Kandinsky - complete nonentity.

And what, you have become taller?

[Маруся]

Fross, too, could not remain silent.

In my opinion, mediocrity is not able to create anything new, outstanding, much less a new direction in art.
And the opinion of Igor Gurieva Here, fortunately, can change anything.

Added after 4 minutes
Artem
if you have quoted my message here till the end, you probably have issues with examples would be necessary.

Сообщение от Maroussia

huge mass of Socialist realism - brilliantly holding academic drawing techniques - but impersonal so that it is impossible to distinguish one from another (with rare exceptions).