Question artists

[Amateur]

Сообщение от Artem

draloskop

Copy what? But what about the signature?

[Артём]

Сообщение от Amateur

Copy what? But what about the signature?

Signatures can and plan to do. What's bothering you? What draloskop 100%. And very quickly done, but an artist. Long draloskop here.

[Amateur]

And yet, what is "draloskop? I'm not familiar with this word. How does he do? For information: the size of the portrait 52h42 cm, image size, see 27h19

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от Amateur

By the way, I compared the portrait and sketch under a stereoscope - evasion in proportions of up to 5%. Is it permissible deviation is for the artist? Still, much as 1 /20. Can he, in fact, put on the uniform general body of another person to write a portrait?

Such evasion is not just acceptable but inevitable.
Look on the drawings by Durer - there are deviations ...
And others, too.

[Артём]

Сообщение от Amateur

And yet, what is "draloskop? I'm not familiar with this word. How did he do?

Draloskop - from the words "fight", "rip off" within the meaning of copy, copy.
Whiteprint - a device for hand copying of drawings, maps, etc. To copy the image (the original) is located on the illuminated table top Face-up, covered with a sheet of blank paper and hand to the light, fortified writing device.

[Amateur]

Сообщение от Artem

Whiteprint - a device for manual copying of drawings, maps, etc. To copy the image (the original) is located on the illuminated table top Face-up, covered with a sheet of blank paper and hand to the light, fortified writing device.

Thank you, I, by the way, and thought, why give in any case the size of the portrait. They do not coincide with the size of the figure is approximately two times, and a stereoscope comparison shows that the proportion of width less than the length, and there is some distortion of the vertical axis. "Draloskop" also gives a copy of 1:1.
And why "draloskop? Meaning? It would be simpler to make a photocopy. At that time, although there was no copy machines (they appeared in 1948), but were "photostat" - a device for copying documents at the special photo paper roll displayed by an appeal directly to the unit. Slow down, than in the modern copy machine, but still quite acceptable.

[ранжер]

Can so.

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от Artem

Whiteprint - a device for manual copying

Long time in terms of build (very necessary in the economy thing! - Now probably have to learn photoshop, but probably such function in Photoshop, too, have?

[Артём]

Сообщение от Amateur

Thank you, I am the way, and thought, why give in any case the size of the portrait. They do not coincide with the size of the figure is approximately two times, and a stereoscope comparison shows that the proportion of width less than the length, and there is some distortion of the vertical axis. "Draloskop" also gives a copy of 1:1.
And why "draloskop? Meaning? It would be simpler to make a photocopy. At that time, although there was no copy machines (they appeared in 1948), but were "photostat" - a device for copying documents at the special photo paper roll displayed by an appeal directly to the unit. Slow down, than in the modern copy machine, but still quite acceptable.

Amateur, excuse me, but so what? Signed a one-or also reduced? The original can be specifically reduced, the signature can tear straight from the original or a reduced copy. It is understandable why the proportions do not match. If I do it all with the camera or using the computer, all of this and give such distortions. I am sure that this draloskop. He gives such assurance the lines and movements in the figure.
but were "photostat" - a device for copying documents at the special photo paper roll
I think that everything is much simpler. Someone is needed for someone or something.

[Amateur]

Сообщение от Artem

The original can be specifically reduced, the signature can tear straight from the original or a reduced copies.

Yes, everything can be done. But this is not seen the slightest sense. Why should "tear" on the copy when you can take it very? Why work with a pencil, making a copy of a copy when you can simply perefotografirovat? And it will be better and more accurate. Meaning?

But the signature "tear" generally safe. Well, the artist's signature is not so important in this case as the signature of Montgomery. Compare with the genuineness of the signature (see attachment). "Pulling" a signature ... Yes this "artist," I think then it would be under martial law would be planted in full. And after the war, few would have been, because Montgomery was not only charismatic figure, a knight of all the higher orders of the Allied powers (including the Soviet Order of Victory), but he was after the war, the highest positions in the Armed Forces of Great Britain and NATO.

Now if you really "pulling" on the copy, then perhaps, with a copy of the portrait rather than his thumbnail. From then she took the date of writing, which is the portrait not? Its very few people knew. By the way, this date is confirmed in the unpublished diaries of Edward printing Ardizzona (Edward Ardizzone, 1900 - 1979), a full-time painter 8 th Army, the text is in the network.

Incidentally, the figure right part of the face model (left figure), and chin - darker than the portrait. There is a noticeable difference in the badges, particularly in the Middle. There is also, it is in stereo well in sight. No, I do not think that this "draloskop.

Сообщение от Artem

Someone is needed for someone or something.

Agree, that your argument hardly seems convincing.