Film & Video Art

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от Ginger

Why should we give up in the Bond glamor?

Because the world is changing, because the era of portfolio investors disappearing. And Bond must respond to these realities, otherwise it will turn into a comic. A comic book without missing. And "jaguar" with Land Rover is owned by Hindus, while the British are a surprise vskinutoy eyebrow

[Ginger]

No, do not get me wrong, I liked the Bond ... I like it a priori Bond ... because this is Bond ... James Bond as well - is something that can not not like it .... that they are not removed, I will sit in the day of the premiere and applaud! But modernized Bond - is like a fifth of a point on two chairs ... The authors want to ride on the wave of Bond's typical methods, and thus catch the tail of the spirit of the proletariat. And that something is seriously underpaid. While this is of course all you can justify that sort of Jamie Craig plays Bond in his youth, which only just issued a number, and he does not know what to do 007. But if so things keep going, then the new Bourne, who in 2009, may God will be more likely to take over the minds of mankind!

[art2008]

Watch with sound
http://trinixy.ru/2008/06/19/chel_ja...et_107_mb.html

[Vladimir]

After the points become clear once all is clear This is still staging trick.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 2 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Ginger

so if things keep going, then the new Bourne, who in 2009, may God will be more likely to take over the minds of mankind!

The main thing is that they came out in opposition, rather than simultaneously. To most of both of them to watch. Bourn was promising, when out of steam with the Brosnan Bond, and now Craig's contract on the third movie, and Matt Damon does not become younger

[fross]

Сообщение от Vladimir

Because the world is changing, because the era of portfolio investors rooted in the past

And you can about it in details? Something about this weather, I have not yet heard. And what kinds of modern dinosaurs survive on your forecasts?

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от fross

Because the world is changing, because the era of portfolio investors wane

And you can about it in details?

Dear fross, admit, I did not build a coherent theory. It is just at the level of sensations. Half a century the world does not know a world war, no deep global crises and may God continue to be known. But the fact is that during this time, many began to play. There was a belief in the virtual nature of welfare. Receded material nature of wealth, the role of physical labor. Post-industrial economy, post-modernism in art. Made possible a situation where the capitalization of Gazprom is lower than the capitalization of Google. The situation, when investment banks swell of money, as manufacturers of cars and utility right people easily airlines fly into the pipe. People somehow have forgotten that the internet is not bread namazhesh and some plumber situautsii importantly any super-duper Sayles. And crises are arranged quickly everything in its place. "Portfolio investor" in my post - is a kind of collective image of the character formally successful, but deeply meaningless in terms of development and little is able to solve without the help of money. It sounds pathetic, but if hard tryahnet, all likely will fall into place when the status of the farmer will be higher than the speculator

[fross]

Сообщение от Vladimir

It sounds pathetic, but if hard tryahnet, all likely will fall into place when the status of the farmer will be higher than the speculator

Well said, and noticed a sense true, but this state of affairs is not one hundred years and will not change.
By the way, investing in art is also a kind of portfolio investment, you do not find?

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от fross

investment in art is also a kind of portfolio investment, you can not find?

Art has material nature and in addition has a certain moral charge (with a plus or a minus - is not important). But buying and selling "the right to conclude transactions in the future at a fixed price today, some have second derivatives listed on the stock market of this nature do not have. They are even in the form of physical securities do not exist - this world is the movement of records on electronic accounts. By the way, who do not know, but Russia's stock exchanges (MICEX and RTS) predstavlyut the essence of the server, all transactions take place automatically through electronic applications - the men with bulging eyes who throw back their hands and shouting out prices on the trading floor at the Russian exchanges there. Americans have, and we have not. That is, and then managed to do without the cost of physical work

[fross]

Сообщение от Vladimir

That is, and then managed to do without the cost of physical work

That is, intellectual work you do for work do not think so?
And as the futures - order the artist at the picture, not concerned?
The reason for any crisis - only immoderate greed, and he never served as a proof of the superiority of one type deyatelkosti over another.

[LCR]

Сообщение от Vladimir

Art has material nature and in addition has a certain moral charge (with a plus or a minus - is not important). But buying and selling "the right to conclude transactions in the future at a fixed price today, some have second derivatives listed on the stock market of this nature do not have. They are even in the form of physical securities do not exist - this world is the movement of records on electronic accounts. By the way, who do not know, but Russia's stock exchanges (MICEX and RTS) predstavlyut the essence of the server, all transactions take place automatically through electronic applications - the men with bulging eyes who throw back their hands and shouting out prices on the trading floor at the Russian exchanges there. Americans have, and we have not. That is, and then managed to do without the cost of physical work

Do not get so much blame the "right to conclude transactions in the future at a fixed price today, it came up quite negluby and quite respectable people - Archimedes, which was produced in such a way to sell their olive oil, which gave him vozmozzhnost invest in this tasty and nutritious produce

As for the exchange with bulging eyes - that they are on the NYSE and on NASDAQ - no, because it is also an electronic server.