Small Paintings - Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство

Wladzislaw · 30.03.2010, 16:20

Цитата:

Сообщение от heir 1010261

Why not assume that this - the church seal? And then I drew on the icon of the purified, either directly on top.

You are currently viewing a gallop and crest of ostrich feathers. The majority of Russian noble families небыло emblems, that came up with different things.

наследник · 30.03.2010, 18:07

Hardly ... Why hide the emblem on the back, if they have to boast?
Here ... as possible to consider ... some deepening. I will not try to say maybe, but so do the icons on Mount Athos.

Кирилл Сызранский · 30.03.2010, 18:37

Цитата:

Сообщение от heir

can not insist perhaps, but did so with the icons on Athos.

This is what is the monasteries on Mount Athos, the Holy set the same (or similar) print?

наследник · 30.03.2010, 19:09

Names to appear ... This is not me. This is to Google.

Кирилл Сызранский · 30.03.2010, 19:34

Цитата:

Сообщение от heir

names, appearance ... This is not me. This is to Google.

Yes I just saw Athos icons with cliches (not stamped) monasteries, where they were written or where they were only sanctified.
And you, apparently, do not even understand what you write.
What are you doing here, guru?

Added after 25 minutes

Цитата:

Сообщение от heir

New material for book collecting. To be continued "Oil Paintings".

Gather in silence, not Flooding on the topics.

U_Z · 30.03.2010, 20:52

Your printing - simplified view of noble coat of arms.

Standard shield with a monogram, knight's helmet with peacock feathers on the helmet should be a crown, by the form which you can determine which owned the title of master of the press: Earl, Baron ... The edges of the shield and helmet - identify, but it is practically not visible. All you could see in the photo.

For monogram and coat of arms to identify the owner of virtually not possible, since it represents the standard elements and, unfortunately, is not particularly noteworthy.

A full-emblem on the shield has a distinctive elements that can be defined and its affiliation to a particular race. In this case they are absent.

Eriksson · 31.03.2010, 04:12

Met several times paintings that were in Polish possession. With the stigma of wax and tergite and coats of arms. No doubt, the fashion was such a pans in 19 century.

Анет · 01.04.2010, 09:27

Цитата:

Сообщение от Eriksson

met several times paintings that were in Polish possession. With the stigma of wax and tergite and coats of arms. No doubt, the fashion was such a pans in 19 century.

Tell me please, if stigma does not mean anything, then approximately how much you can ask for such a pretty (in my opinion) the picture?

Похожие темы
Тема	Автор	Разделы	Ответов	Последние сообщения
Who said that they were small?	LCR	Art Kaleidoscope	13	15.11.2009 13:21
A small watercolor "The Bell"	Благодаров	Costs, valuation, attribution	14	16.09.2009 22:37
Small watercolor	vadim	Costs, valuation, attribution	17	06.08.2009 00:39
Help evaluate the small collection	SergArt	Costs, valuation, attribution	3	09.04.2009 11:37

30.03.2010, 18:07	Язык оригинала: Русский #2
наследник Гуру Регистрация: 08.02.2009 Адрес: Петербург Сообщений: 2,497 Спасибо: 278 Поблагодарили 598 раз(а) в 403 сообщениях Репутация: 893	Hardly ... Why hide the emblem on the back, if they have to boast? Here ... as possible to consider ... some deepening. I will not try to say maybe, but so do the icons on Mount Athos.

30.03.2010, 19:09	Язык оригинала: Русский #4
наследник Гуру Регистрация: 08.02.2009 Адрес: Петербург Сообщений: 2,497 Спасибо: 278 Поблагодарили 598 раз(а) в 403 сообщениях Репутация: 893	Names to appear ... This is not me. This is to Google.

30.03.2010, 20:52	Язык оригинала: Русский #6
U_Z Гуру Регистрация: 20.07.2009 Адрес: Москва Сообщений: 1,901 Спасибо: 1,604 Поблагодарили 1,629 раз(а) в 864 сообщениях Репутация: 2853	Your printing - simplified view of noble coat of arms. Standard shield with a monogram, knight's helmet with peacock feathers on the helmet should be a crown, by the form which you can determine which owned the title of master of the press: Earl, Baron ... The edges of the shield and helmet - identify, but it is practically not visible. All you could see in the photo. For monogram and coat of arms to identify the owner of virtually not possible, since it represents the standard elements and, unfortunately, is not particularly noteworthy. A full-emblem on the shield has a distinctive elements that can be defined and its affiliation to a particular race. In this case they are absent.

31.03.2010, 04:12	Язык оригинала: Русский #7
Eriksson Гуру Регистрация: 13.11.2008 Адрес: Стокгольм Сообщений: 2,829 Спасибо: 2,474 Поблагодарили 2,597 раз(а) в 943 сообщениях Репутация: 4971	Met several times paintings that were in Polish possession. With the stigma of wax and tergite and coats of arms. No doubt, the fashion was such a pans in 19 century.