Вернуться   Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство > English forum > Art Kaleidoscope
 English | Русский Forum ARTinvestment.RU RSS Регистрация Дневники Справка Сообщество Сообщения за день Поиск

Art Kaleidoscope Interesting and relevant information about art. Discuss general art issues and any topics not covered in other forums. It’s only about art — love, politics, sports, hobbies etc. are discussed in “Chatter”.

 
 
Опции темы Опции просмотра
Старый 26.03.2010, 17:33 Язык оригинала: Русский       #7
Старожил
 
Аватар для luka77
 
Регистрация: 25.12.2009
Сообщений: 652
Спасибо: 9,122
Поблагодарили 2,524 раз(а) в 496 сообщениях
Репутация: 4980
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от LCR Посмотреть сообщение
As for the Armenian avant-garde expressionism and 60-80 years. can not say anything, but:

Even if we add to this list of some Arshile Gorky (who was bought, no doubt, not because of his Armenian roots, along with other American expressionists - but if five million "Bust of a woman with bangs" - one of the most expensive works of her "meeting", then one must assume that its collection is absent on the Pollock and Rothko), how can I say about the taste, the more "perfect"? It's just names on the mind, with the mind is in the last 10-15 years, not more.
In this list there is nothing personal:

Hollywood kitchuha Tamara Lempicka, not so long ago forged "a great artist, Frida Callo, the champion of" investment aspect "Picasso and Hirst, with whom she was in this very aspect of a little missed - all this is typical of the" new collectors, collectors are in the usual sense and not.


Arshile Gorky and Tamara Lempicka, Fernand Leger and Demien Hurst - that actually collects this woman, what is the general idea of this collection? Maybe someone can explain to me?
What can the general idea of collecting "names" (and I think that not so inept and hopeless as they are revoked) resonate with her name "Only in the fine arts, and she's in show business.
As for Hearst, she is hardly missed, in any case it is a gift
Believe me, we know at least that there is a celebrity in private collections, and Picasso for $ 5 million is not the most expensive lot in her collection .<!--~ 10 "->
"New collectors," "usual sense" - I think that these are relative terms, and where a variable, especially when they are taken for the powerful of this world, trendsetter, etc, etc.
As for Gorka not know whether it works with her, I wrote about the artists 60-80 years. XX century (not such well-known as A. Hills). This is me and liked that, along with the first names on the wall of her apartment you can see and work just good talent, and yet not so expensive artists ..

http://www.directorinfo.ru/Article.a...=16662&iid=773




Последний раз редактировалось luka77; 26.03.2010 в 18:12.
luka77 вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
 


Ваши права в разделе
Вы не можете создавать новые темы
Вы не можете отвечать в темах
Вы не можете прикреплять вложения
Вы не можете редактировать свои сообщения

BB коды Вкл.
Смайлы Вкл.
[IMG] код Вкл.
HTML код Выкл.

Быстрый переход

Похожие темы
Тема Автор Разделы Ответов Последние сообщения
Stories of paintings and collections Маруся Art Kaleidoscope 17 04.02.2012 19:21
Insurance collections costing less than 400,000 euro AlexanderG Insurance 0 25.11.2009 13:15
In New York auctioned a collection of self-portraits of celebrities SergeiSK Auctions 0 19.09.2009 15:00
Austrian Art of the XIX century from the collections of Prince of Liechtenstein SergeiSK Exhibitions and events 0 15.09.2009 11:31
As a consultant for the formation of private collections? Varvara Investing in Art 2 20.05.2008 23:12





Часовой пояс GMT +3, время: 17:05.
Telegram - Обратная связь - Обработка персональных данных - Архив - Вверх


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Перевод: zCarot