Who is the author of the portrait?

[Seriy]

For their needs has written a free copy of a portrait by a famous artist . It hangs for a while online and straight people persistently tormented me about the author of the original, which I am very surprised . No one can not yet guess. The artist is extremely well known , and work too. I'm sure that does not frighten the AI ​​forum and call soon :-)
Or am I really so nakopiroval that do not recognize? :-)
My - 30h24 , paper , oil.

Thank you!

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Seriy, I do not understand the question.

You do not know the original author?

Tamara de Lempicka (1898-1980).

That you had to?
Whose portrait - I do not know, or rather, I do not remember, of course.

Added after 1 minutes

Сообщение от Seriy

No one can not yet guess.

And, guess you offer?

But it's easy, Seriy.
>

[Элис]

Portrait of a man with the collar turned up, 1931

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Alice

Portrait of a man with the collar turned up, 1931

And, for sure!
>

Portrait of a Man with His Collar Turned Up B.150

circa1931

Oil on wood panel

41 x 33 cm (16 1 /8 x 13 in)

T. DE LEMPICKA.
(Top left)

(Portrait d'homme au col relevé)

Even today, this superb portrait of a man is hardly outdated.
Notice the lips, which are as thick as in the portrait of the Grand Duke Gabriel.

Collections

1930 - Purchased directly by Mr.
Charles Gillal - U.S.A.

1983 - Barry Friedman Ltd.
- U.S.A.

1984 - Private collection - U.S.A.


Exhibitions

1984 - Hollywood American Legion Post, "Tamara", Los Angeles, United States


Auctions

26/03/1983 - NEW YORK.
Christie's "Tamara-5286",#99 $ 18 000

[Seriy]

Cyril Syzran, yes, I did not tell the author, it is proposed to himself to say, but nobody could guess ..

Posted 2 minutes
U_Z, why? I have always lurks , and Fauvism , I write almost monochrome, but some fovistsky it is just the mental and handwriting as slope of the letters. Actually , I wrote a copy of the color of the coat , warm, solid, wanted to replicate the color.

[U_Z]

Сообщение от Seriy

U_Z, why?

I see.
But still I wish you a "movement" in the direction of the original painting.

[NATA NOVA]

Seriy, see Anna Akhmatova Natan Altman ..

Added after 3 minutes

Сообщение от U_Z

should this have to do something

Swot anatomy ... (can not escape)

Added after 8 minutes

Сообщение от Seriy

well, just not to distinguish from Grigorieva on style and techniques.

such a fashion was started ... ... Allemand (v1914 year)

[Seriy]

K-Maler,
NATA NOVA, yes, I plan to take a vacation and compensatory time off, just work out a pattern, because I became interested in painting portraits. However, when this happens? no idea ...

Posted 9 minutes

Сообщение от U_Z

I know. But still I wish you a "movement" in the direction of the original painting.

I "be original" I will not. The fact that I have a gun out - it's uncontrollable, it is in the subconscious, and from there transferred to the hand. It can only score some more impressive or, perhaps, time. The influence of Picasso, Derain, Vlaminck, Matisse on me and one deep, it comes out from everywhere and will continue to come out. A "knit" because it fits the type of my psyche. Would have been different mentality, perhaps influenced by other artists and other art to come out ... Incidentally, in America, none of Picasso, with regard to my art, do not remember, but definitely talked-Serg Matisse ...:-)
 Lempicka interested because at closer look you see not only the influence of mannerist and art-deco ... personally I can see the influence of the Fauves, particularly Derain, amounting at times to follow, and Cubism, ie, it appears to me Lempicka - "native" an artist.

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от Seriy; 1892301"

turns out, I Lempicka - " native " artist .

Lempicka ( style ) in the artistic sense , deep secondary (IMHO ) .. The commercial success of " falling into the stream of style and taste "- that is another subject ( the subject of another study)

Learning should be (better) in the original ( primary sources)

Posted 3 minutes

Сообщение от Seriy; 1892301"

I " be original " I will not.

"Originality" - meant "individual uniqueness"
( I understand U_Z)
To have a priori swept aside " search yourself" ?

[Seriy]

NATA NOVA, I'll describe here now as I am a graduate of Moscow State University, Ph.D., a former high school teacher, I understand that such an individual style and secondary primacy in painting. Cited about science, because my explanation would be slightly formalized and mechanistic, not in terms of art.
 Painting is something that is discussed and evaluated, not career, not an artist, not the environment, not even an array of his work ... just a picture. A picture - this is an equation with many variables.
Some of them are described in detail the theory of composition and color theory. For example, a detailed analysis of prof.Kandinsky what happens if you move the angle to the edge of the blade, and the point - in the center, and no matter what you do represents the corner, and that is the point.
Some of these variables has not been studied in such detail, some of the variables introduced by new generations of artists.
 The equation for a given variable, one has the right solution and an infinite number of wrong. The correct solution is in the painting style. New styles of painting are rare and often a collective work, but the result can be explained only one picture, because, as mentioned above, a correct decision. A single picture to explain what Cubism, one in order to explain what impressionism, surrealism, one, etc. If you can not define the style of the artist in which he works, it probably is - slurred, t e is an infinite number of wrong decisions.
 There is no primacy of painting, the picture is always secondary, because it can either be done entirely in one style, or composed of several styles. Yes, there are revolutionaries, like the founders of Cubism - Picasso and Braque, but in real life to anyone with this deal is not necessary.
When we think we see something new, it is likely that we are poorly educated in the history of painting. I enjoyed a very original Picasso Romanesque period, until I saw a painting by Cezanne, Picasso, which is used to create it. And this work of Picasso with a wide field of pure ultramarine and shades the ground around a thread can be stretched to other artists, such as N. Nesterova with the same field of pure ultramarine and shades of the earth - white, black, ocher around.
So what's involved in an artist? Two things-first, he must learn to clearly, accurately, clearly, to speak - for this to understand how the pattern is arranged and to be able to use this understanding. Second, he must understand how styles can reflect his personal psychophysics, that person is inherent, because if the artist will use his alien styles, he has nothing intelligent does not work, the individual must meet psychophysics viewed by styles.
When people say, "it is necessary to seek an individual style," to me it sounds like "it is necessary to seek a mirror in which I look different."

 Lempicka - an outstanding artist and full recognition is yet to come. Glamour, cover characters overshadowed her artistic nature of its achievements. But time carries with it signs of the times, topical, posters of her images, performs forward synthesis of styles that it has implemented and embodied in the 20's and 30's. She has a great nude, stunning still lifes, portraits of great - the farther, the better they will appreciate. It works very fine color, which is the coat in a portrait, a blow in the eye. So can only supermaster.