Pre-funk, School of San Francisco

[Игорь Гурьев]

Originally Posted by rainyday

you know that I am in this with you strongly disagreed

You see.

Two empty and uninteresting plane in mid-song - is not even a Velazquez did not cope with such a composition.

Morandi would have coped, but he would not do such a heavy velvet curtain and the sky and not added to either standing, or falling chair on the right, and other details.

Well, the color of a Morandi would sing, sing ...

And then somehow very hard for everything. Feels like it gave him hard.

And besides, I do not feel anything that would be me not so much astonished, but at least comforted.

Only the inconvenience of the artist, that he showed just how it is difficult to write a simple motif.

And even then that would be a simple motive, then such simplicity, which is worse than theft, in my opinion, with these empty planes out of place, devoid of texture, and color: just paint, in my opinion.

[LCR]

Originally Posted by rainyday

yes that's right - abstracted realism
that was not Repinsky realism
Repin, although I really respect and kitsch have nicknamed it did not,

for artists' posleabstraktsionistov "
so to speak

depicted object is only a pretext
for painting as an organization of color and form in the plane of the canvas

Yeah, it is difficult to imagine that Bischoff asked someone (Dibenkorna of, say, or Park) pririsoval to him in the picture dog, as some heroes Losers Mr. Igor Gur'eva

[Mihail]

Originally Posted by LCR

Yeah, it is difficult to imagine that Bischoff asked someone (Dibenkorna, say, or park) pririsoval his dog in the picture, as some heroes Losers Mr. Igor Gur'eva - ->

That much was given you this dog! "I. Levitan people fit into the picture ....
Reshetnikov, though not the most talented painter, but to stick it labels - like - a failed animal painter - yet somehow not nice, or you have something personal to him .....

[Игорь Гурьев]

That laid out by Comrade. LSR in the last message - it is such usredennaya Maslovka 1970: psevdoobobschalovo, featureless swab, no motive.

Generally - zero.

About the color I do not speak.

Drawing - at the same Reshetnikov, that is, no.

Something of hopeless and graceless type.

[Pavel]

Originally Posted by Guriev, Igor

And someone opposes?

Is, for example, Matisse contrasted?

Sorry but you have not answered that this lack of sensitivity Picasso?

Posted 6 minutes

Originally Posted by Guriev, Igor

That laid out by Comrade. LSR in the last message - it is such usredennaya Maslovka 1970: psevdoobobschalovo, featureless swab, no motive.

Generally - zero.

About the color I do not speak.

Drawing - at the same Reshetnikov, that is, no.

Something dreary and graceless type.

Maslovka betrayed in the 70 outstanding paintings. Then were in bloom and in the money all the major until their places have not taken the children. This work is a long time in museums and collections and the latest work LSR is very good, because it is a feeling, but with a sensitivity of the artist is clearly at odds

Added after 9 minutes

Originally Posted by LCR

Yeah, it is difficult to imagine that Bischoff asked someone (Dibenkorna, say, or park) pririsoval his dog in the picture, as some heroes Losers Mr. Igor Gur'eva - ->

Actually Reshetnikov had such success with the public, and even now is that we should not ... Elephant is an elephant

Actually, I have long said that oroginalnost is not always an abstraction or concept. It's just a talented work of talented artists and does not depend on the style, and vice versa. There is.

[Игорь Гурьев]

Originally Posted by Pavel

Sorry but you have not answered that this lack of sensitivity Picasso?

He had no light in the pictures, you will not notice?

[Pavel]

Originally Posted by Guriev, Igor

It is no light in the pictures, you will not notice?

I repeat, you have not made clear what light perception, which Picasso did not own? Picasso graduated from the academy in 14 years and made academic painting, which was shown at the World Exhibition in Paris. Do not look for what it lacks, and see how all he has many.

Added after 2 minutes

Originally Posted by LCR

Yeah, it is difficult to imagine that Bischoff asked someone (Dibenkorna, say, or park) pririsoval his dog in the picture, as some heroes Losers Mr. Igor Gur'eva - ->

What size? Perhaps it is a successful sketch? But the work integral and understandable, all at meste.Horosho.

[Игорь Гурьев]

Originally Posted by Pavel

I repeat, you have not made clear what light perception, which Picasso did not own? Picasso graduated from the academy in 14 years and made academic painting, which was shown at the World Exhibition in Paris. Do not look for what it lacks, and see how all he has many.

He really just a lot, but with the light - not so hot.

[Pavel]

Originally Posted by Guriev, Igor

It is really just a lot, but with the light - not so hot.

A lot of expressiveness. Explain about the light?

[Игорь Гурьев]

Originally Posted by Pavel

Many of expressiveness. Explain about light?

Well, the picture should or shining, like Matisse, or it must be shown the light, carried some svetopostanovka.

Take Caravaggio, Van Gogh, Laktionova - all of them have svetopostanovka, a light source that illuminates the objects, and the light plays on these subjects.

We take, on the other hand, "Zaporozhtsev" Repin: pale gray, uninteresting light, ruining everything.

Why? Of course, it's easier to paint, all in one tone, without harsh shadows.

The same applies to "the First Cavalry," by Alexander Gerasimov.

Of course, another of Picasso art system, there is no bulk items that you can mentally move in space, but the light at the Picasso is conditional, it is almost X-ray some - smooth, cool, etc.

Considering also that a strong colorist, he never was.