Who should pay for the hobby?

[Pavel]

Сообщение от DSF

Often so happens, and often the artist seems to ordinary people as abnormal and unpredictable. That would throw the business and drove off to Tahiti Or buy the latest money any etching, but at home nothing to eat, you moron

Money can be take, but the engraving of leaves, or Cezanne in the past the money and the rest of his life that Cezanne is an artist in Tahiti, such as color relationships, which does not happen and which, once seen, makes an artist great.
You are not an artist, dear, you do not understand.

Added after 2 minutes

Сообщение от Semen Semenovich

How not cool, but these disputes will always go ... Each work must be paid, based on the requests of the market and if this work someone needs.
There is a position of the artist (talent) and the position galereista (gifted) - they should simply agree, based on mutual opportunities. If the gallery less successful than the artist, the latter will look more successful ... Here one must match the other. And soon to talk about human and professional relations, and not that the gallery wants to bend under the artist himself, turning it from the creator of "what you please ... Gallery This is certainly not interested. However, I disagree with the fact that the work on order - only maloprofessionalnyh and uncreative artists. This is the same form of expression of the artist (or rather one ..). Certainly, the work of only for order makes the artist in just a craftsman, but ... After all, "creativity" in its pure form kills the craft (if it was). And here is unknown, what is worse ... But here again we go into the subject, but should an artist be an artist and own izogramotoy? Again, the opinions diverge. I would like to wish everyone who aspires to it, or find their artists, or their gallery ...

You see, you have to understand.