A good artist - a successful artist?

[AlexanderG]

[QUOTE=Seriy;656136]IMHO, until the 20 th century artist, generally applied profession, was to paint the church, to paint a picture of the battle, portraits, and so T e was a good artist, by definition successful. If it is bad, who would give him an order for a portrait? And since the end of the 19 th when the paintings began to be interested as a separate value and began to appear unsuccessful artists, but rarely. Cause-increased the lag time between the creation of the product and its consumption and life cycle of the author's sometimes lag that did not have time to meet.[/QOUTE]

Ogromnoe spasibo za etot otvet. Imenno k etomu vyvodu ia prishiol delaia issledovanie po art rynku. Kak ia uze gde-to pisal, mirovoi art rynok eto ochen 'molodaia organizatsiia. Kogda nechego o tovare skazat ', sozdaiutsia legendy.

Daze istoriia iskusstv byla sozdana i podognana pod rynok.
Eschio raz spasibo.