Paintings Chagall-fake?

[Glasha]

Сообщение от Vladimir

In this in tseretellevskom museum has a good collection and works of the sixties and contemporary art

This collection Zaripova you mean? It was exhibited there in the spring and early summer.

[Allena]

Сообщение от Gala

you mean a collection Zaripova?

I think not only. It is very good meeting and the sixties, and contemporary art. Many things passed relatives of artists, many - by the authors themselves - in short, an indisputable provenance. A list of Chagall, Goncharova, Malevich Pirosmani and can be supplemented, at least Lentulov and Cluny. While we want to believe that Pirosmani this - very beautiful work.

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от Gala

you mean a collection Zaripova? It was exhibited there in the spring and early summer.

Not up to date, and was in the museum at Petrovka in the middle of summer, everything was in place Maybe I still have pictures, look for

[color="# 666686"]Added after 2 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Allena

While we want to believe that Pirosmani this - very beautiful work.

To paraphrase qwerty, wrapped in a real Golden Fleece.

[Allena]

Сообщение от Vladimir

To paraphrase qwerty, wrapped in a real Golden Fleece.

I'm not a big fan of naive art, but they think stops. And as for the rune, almost certainly, you're right, alas.

[Евгений]

Executive Director MMSI Vasily Tsereteli, in a conversation with the correspondent Lenty.ru "described it as" working point "and explained that the three disputed works do not pass through Paris Chagall fund, so there can not attest to their authenticity. But the artist in the 1960's and 1970's to make sure it - indeed his early paintings.

[qwerty]

Similarly the authenticity of their works, are in the museum, confirmed due to the spirits of Malevich, Filonov Lentulova and Pirosmani.