Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство

Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/index.php)
-   Art Kaleidoscope (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/forumdisplay.php?f=236)
-   -   Paintings Chagall-fake? (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=4856)

Евгений 10.09.2008 14:08

Paintings Chagall-fake?
 
Interesting article on-ARTinvestment.RU

Chagall's paintings brought to Japan by the Moscow Museum of Modern Art - a fake?
Paintings of Marc Chagall "Family", "Fiddler" and "Portrait of a Woman", which brought in Japan, Moscow Museum of Modern Art - is a fake. This informed the Japanese organizers of the exhibition, the Committee Chagall (Paris), newspaper "Asahi".

"Technology, which met these three works, says that it does not step", - noted the rights holders and demanded that the painting was removed from the exposure. The Japanese side, in turn, said that its experts "have not the slightest doubt about the authenticity. Nevertheless, this situation may adversely affect the schedule of exhibitions. In particular, the next exhibition due to open September 25 in Osaka. Organizers, the newspaper said, insisting that Moscow Museum of Modern Art and the Chagall Committee held direct talks to resolve the disputed issue.

June 21 Moscow Museum of Modern Art opened Japan's first exhibition of Russian avant-garde. In it, in addition to Marc Chagall, works by many other artists, including Natalia Goncharova, Niko Pirosmani and Kasimir Malevich.

Vladimir 10.09.2008 14:40

Цитата:

Сообщение от Eugene (Сообщение 51856)
June 21 Moscow Museum of Modern Art opened Japan's first exhibition of Russian avant-garde. In it, in addition to Marc Chagall, works by many other artists, including Natalia Goncharova, Niko Pirosmani and Kasimir Malevich.

For the entire list can easily be continued. Predictable. These works have long been considered to put it mildly, controversial. " Why were taken to show these "masterpieces" - is unclear. What a joy when you poked your finger? Thus in tseretellevskom museum has a good collection and works of the sixties and contemporary art, without any doubt the authenticity. Why "decorate" it Rozanov, Malevich and loose Pirosmani, again, incomprehensible.

Glasha 10.09.2008 14:49

Цитата:

Сообщение от Vladimir (Сообщение 51876)
In this in tseretellevskom museum has a good collection and works of the sixties and contemporary art

This collection Zaripova you mean? It was exhibited there in the spring and early summer.

Allena 10.09.2008 15:11

Цитата:

Сообщение от Gala (Сообщение 51896)
you mean a collection Zaripova?

I think not only. It is very good meeting and the sixties, and contemporary art. Many things passed relatives of artists, many - by the authors themselves - in short, an indisputable provenance. A list of Chagall, Goncharova, Malevich Pirosmani and can be supplemented, at least Lentulov and Cluny. While we want to believe that Pirosmani this - very beautiful work.

Vladimir 10.09.2008 15:23

Цитата:

Сообщение от Gala (Сообщение 51896)
you mean a collection Zaripova? It was exhibited there in the spring and early summer.

Not up to date, and was in the museum at Petrovka in the middle of summer, everything was in place:) Maybe I still have pictures, look for:)

[color="# 666686"]Added after 2 minutes[/color]
Цитата:

Сообщение от Allena (Сообщение 51906)
While we want to believe that Pirosmani this - very beautiful work.

To paraphrase qwerty, wrapped in a real Golden Fleece.

Allena 10.09.2008 15:51

Цитата:

Сообщение от Vladimir (Сообщение 51916)
To paraphrase qwerty, wrapped in a real Golden Fleece.

I'm not a big fan of naive art, but they think stops. And as for the rune, almost certainly, you're right, alas.

Евгений 10.09.2008 16:05

Executive Director MMSI Vasily Tsereteli, in a conversation with the correspondent Lenty.ru "described it as" working point "and explained that the three disputed works do not pass through Paris Chagall fund, so there can not attest to their authenticity. But the artist in the 1960's and 1970's to make sure it - indeed his early paintings.

qwerty 10.09.2008 17:38

Similarly the authenticity of their works, are in the museum, confirmed due to the spirits of Malevich, Filonov Lentulova and Pirosmani.

Кирилл Сызранский 10.09.2008 21:14

Цитата:

Сообщение от Vladimir (Сообщение 51876)
The entire list can easily be continued. Predictable. These works have long been considered to put it mildly "controversial"

My friend says this: The Museum of questionable art.

Vladimir 11.09.2008 00:26

Цитата:

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky (Сообщение 52106)
My friend says this: The Museum of questionable art.

But then the important proviso that the post-war art and Contemporary Russian art in the museum fairly strong selection, as if there is a lot to see. And by the way, the atmosphere is friendly - very felt on the background of a number of other museums. Remove to this "vanguard" to the store and was used not to find fault with anything.


Часовой пояс GMT +3, время: 16:10.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Перевод: zCarot